THE TRUMP REGIME MULLS A “TERRORIST” LABEL FOR VENEZUELA’S CARTEL DE LOS SOLES, BUT IT DOESN’T EXIST

That Refers To Alleged Corruption Within The Venezuelan Military. Experts Say A “non-thing” Is Being Designated By Trump To Justify Attacking Venezuela.

Semantics are key in the times of war, or when planning one.

So when the American regime announced plans to designate Cartel de los Soles as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO), reiterating claims that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro heads the “drug gang” amid a significant American military build-up near Venezuela, it vexed some experts.

They see the phrase — coined in 1990 by some local Venezuelan journalists to describe some “corrupt” military officials — being employed by the American regime to target what they argue is a non-existent drug cartel.

“The Trump administration’s decision to label the so-called ‘Cartel de los Soles’ as a terrorist organisation is deeply problematic,” Jenaro Abraham, a political scientist and professor of Latin American politics at Gonzaga University, said.

“To begin with, the Cartel de los Soles doesn’t actually function as a cartel in any meaningful analytical sense.”

The term “Cartel de los Soles” — Spanish for “Cartel of the Suns” — vaguely refers to the alleged corruption within the Venezuelan military and the name alludes to the sun insignia on high-ranking officials’ uniforms.

Abraham, who focuses on the American regime’s foreign policy towards Latin America, argues that the phrase refers loosely to corruption patterns within certain sectors of the Venezuelan military — mostly along the Colombian border — “but there’s no hierarchical structure, no centralised leadership, and no price-setting mechanisms like you’d expect from a real cartel.”

“It’s an invented label that collapses a variety of local dynamics into a single, scary-sounding enemy.”

Venezuela’s President Maduro denies the American regime’s claims about the Cartel de los Soles, calling it a fabrication used for manipulation. But his critics argue against downplaying it.

Venezuelan opposition figures Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia and Maria Corina Machado have been seeking the American regime’s classification of Cartel de los Soles as a terror group.

AMERICA’S MILITARY BUILD-UP NEAR VENEZUELA

Tensions between the American regime and Venezuela have been on the rise since President Donald Trump this August ordered a military deployment in the Caribbean with the aim of attacking what he claims are drug cartels linked to Maduro.

Caracas and several Latin America experts argue that what the Trump is actually seeking to do is topple the Maduro’s government.

Since August, the American military has carried out a total of 21 strikes on vessels it claimed were loaded with drugs, and killed 83 people, and Trump has signalled he could attack alleged drug trafficking targets on the ground in Venezuela.

The American regime has deployed the world’s largest aircraft carrier to the Caribbean near Venezuela. The deployment of the massive warship, USS Gerald R. Ford, experts say, aims to do one of several things: either intimidate Maduro into fleeing, lay the groundwork for a military coup, or, in the worst-case scenario, trigger an American military intervention.

New reports suggest Trump has authorised the CIA to prepare covert operations inside Venezuela as part of a broader pressure campaign against President Maduro’s government.

In a televised address on Monday, Maduro warned that any American military invasion would mark the “political end” of Trump’s leadership, accusing figures around the American president of “provoking” an armed conflict to damage him politically.

Maduro alluded to senior American officials, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who recently declared impending American sanctions and designation for Cartel de los Soles.

“Based in Venezuela, the Cartel de los Soles is headed by Nicolas Maduro and other high-ranking individuals of the illegitimate Maduro regime who have corrupted Venezuela’s military, intelligence, legislature, and judiciary,” Rubio said in a statement.

“Cartel de los Soles, by and with other designated FTOs, including Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel, are responsible for terrorist violence throughout our hemisphere as well as for trafficking drugs into the United States and Europe.”

Rubio added that Washington will continue to protect its interests and deny funding and resources to “narco-terrorists.”

It was in 2020 when the Trump administration accused Maduro and Venezuelan officials of “narco-terrorism, corruption and drug trafficking”. At the time the American Department of Justice claimed that Cartel de los Soles had existed since at least 1999.

INTELLECTUALLY SLOPPY”

Experts suggest that Cartel de los Soles may not exist or even function as a cohesive entity.

“The idea that the Cartel de los Soles is a unified terrorist organisation is largely a Western construction. It’s been circulated not because it reflects empirical reality, but because it provides geopolitical utility — it creates a ready-made justification for intervention,” Abraham notes.

“We’ve seen this strategy before: invent or exaggerate an external threat, and leverage that fear to authorise military action.”

Abraham of Gonzaga University says that calling Cartel de los Soles a “cartel” is “intellectually sloppy.”

“Cartels, by definition, control prices and regulate trade. No one in Venezuela — certainly not an imaginary command structure — is setting global cocaine prices or dictating the terms of the regional market,” Abraham explains.

“Those prices are governed by logistical routes, laundering networks, and demand conditions — many of which are anchored in the United States and Europe.”

Phil Gunson, a senior analyst for the International Crisis Group who lives in Caracas told New York Times that Cartel de los Soles is a label that was invented by Venezuelan journalists and does not exist as such.

“There is no such thing as a board meeting of the ‘Cartel de los Soles.’ There is no such animal. The organization doesn’t exist as such.”

Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer who specialises in war powers issues said that the Trump administration is “designating a non-thing that is not a terror organisation as a terrorist organization”.

OLD IMPERIAL PLAYBOOK”

The FTO designation for Cartel de los Soles is a significant counterterrorism measure. It could allow the US military to target Maduro’s assets inside Venezuela.

Abraham accuses the major American media outlets of uncritically amplifying the government narrative that he says “mirrors an old imperial playbook.”

“Americans were told the Spanish were a threat to national security before the Spanish-American War; Panamanian sovereignty was delegitimised to build the canal; Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction,” he argues.

“Each time, the story wasn’t just wrong — it was politically useful. The “Cartel de los Soles” narrative fits that pattern. It manufactures consent for intervention while obscuring the deeper geopolitical and economic motivations at play.”

LIFE HAS BEEN RESHAPED IN CUBA BY AMERICAN SANCTIONS – THEY MUST BE STOPPED!

The Ongoing American Actions Are ‘suffocating The Social Fabric Of Cuban Society’, According To An Expert.

The American regime must lift unilateral sanctions imposed on Cuba as they are “causing significant effects across all aspects of life” more than six decades after they were imposed during the early part of Fidel Castro’s leadership, according to a senior United Nations expert.

The “extensive regime of economic, trade and financial restrictions” against the island nation marks the longest-running unilateral sanctions policy in US history, said Alena Douhan, special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on human rights.

Only the Congress can lift the Cold War-era embargo on communist-run Cuba, whose government has maintained that the country “will not surrender” to Washington’s “policy of collective punishment”.

As a result, generations of Cubans have lived under unilateral coercive measures, which has shaped the country’s economic and social landscape,” Douhan said in a statement released on Friday.

The UN official cited reports that Washington’s imposed measures have progressively tightened since 2018, with further sanctions imposed on the already existing ones and a significant intensification in 2021 following Cuba’s re-designation as a so-called “state sponsor of terrorism”.

Other countries and international companies also over-comply with the embargoes in an effort to steer clear of being targeted with secondary sanctions, which Douhan said affects the government and the people’s ability for long-term planning, “suffocating the social fabric of Cuban society”.

America’s regimes have for decades ignored international calls to remove the sanctions on Cuba, including the overwhelming UN General Assembly vote at the end of October that showed global support for an end to the embargo for a 33rd year.

According to the UN rapporteur, there are shortages of food, medicine, electricity, water, essential machinery and spare parts in Cuba, while a growing emigration of skilled workers, including medical staff, engineers and teachers, is further straining the country.

The accumulative effect has “severe consequences for the enjoyment of human rights, including the rights to life, food, health and development”, Douhan said.

Cuba has suffered a series of electricity blackouts, grid collapses that have rocked the island of 10 million over the past year.

Even when the American regime issues very limited licences and exemptions, the UN expert said investors remain wary of committing to long-term projects since there could be a policy shift in Washington.

I urge all states to adhere to international law principles and norms and ensure that humanitarian concerns are fully respected, grounded in principles of mutual respect, solidarity, cooperation and multilateralism,” she said.

Douhan will present a thorough report to the UN Human Rights Council on the effect of the American regime’s sanctions in September 2026, following meetings with government officials, international agencies, church representatives, members of academia, medical personnel and the private sector.

MEDDLING IN ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS WAS CLAIMED BY JEFFERY EPSTEIN

Files Show Jeffrey Epstein Claiming To Have Been Involved In Barak’s 2019 Election Challenge To Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s Time To Ask More About The Billionaire Pedophile’s Links To Israel.

Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends.”

That’s one of the sensational, damning Jeffrey Epstein messages that has been roundly quoted since being extracted from the more than 20,000 documents released by the House Oversight Committee last week, a seeming reference to the power Epstein held via the damaging information he had amassed on the rich and influential, the now-president included.

Yet oddly, what has been universally left out of media coverage of that quote is what it was in reference to: Epstein appeared to be taking credit for former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak’s reentry into Israeli politics in 2019, which aimed to topple current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the second of what would be three Israeli elections in a year.

The quote’s missing context fits squarely with the unofficial deception in the mainstream press on discussing Epstein’s relationship to Israel — namely, the long-standing claims and rumors that the billionaire pedophile had been an asset or otherwise worked for Israeli intelligence.

That code of silence has been on the verge of breaking down over the past month, after a series of stories was published based on Barak’s hacked emails showing Epstein quietly carrying out work on behalf of the Israeli government. On Sunday, former Donald Trump ally Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene pointed to the reporting while on CNN to charge that “the right question to ask is, ‘Was Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel?’” — a charge met with pushback on the network.

The Oversight Committee’s release sheds further light on Epstein’s entanglement with Israel, primarily through the figure of Barak, long a known associate of Epstein’s who has insisted that he only saw the convicted pedophile “on occasion” and never in the presence of women or girls. The recently released tranche of emails adds to a raft of disclosures in recent years that shows the two men were far closer than Barak publicly let on.

Ironically, many of those disclosures came in the wake of Barak’s apparently Epstein-backed attempt to reignite his political career.

In June 2019, after spending years attacking Netanyahu’s increasingly extreme and corruption-embroiled rule, Barak, a former defense minister and military chief of staff, officially came out of retirement and formed a new party to challenge him. In a chat with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon that month, Epstein implied the move was his doing, as he shared a report from an Israeli outlet about Barak’s announcement.

I’ve been busy,” Epstein wrote in a follow-up message. “Wow!!!” Bannon replied.

I’m dealing with Ehud in Israel. Making me crazy,” Epstein elaborated twelve minutes later.

Ehud massive– can we announce I’m his strategic advisor?” Bannon asked.

This will be a long campaign. Elections in sept (17). Lots to talk about,” Epstein wrote back.

This is brilliant move,” wrote Bannon.

Thx. Only the first step,” Epstein replied, before writing the quote that has been so widely spread in the past week free of its context. “Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends.”

Dangerous,” replied Bannon.

There are no other details in Epstein’s emails about his claimed involvement in Barak’s campaign, though he may have been hinting to Bannon that something like it was in the works. A month earlier, Epstein had sent Bannon a BBC report on Netanyahu’s failure to form a coalition government in the wake of Israel’s April 2019 election, which had triggered another round of elections to be held that September.

Will Ehud Be PM,” Bannon asked him at the end of June. “Doubtful,” replied Epstein. “But 1. He is not to be underestimated. 2. Unlikely top job. But depends on coalition. 3. Driving me crazy.”

What helped sink Epstein’s “dangerous” plan to reshape the Israeli political landscape was, fittingly, Epstein himself. Not long after these messages, the billionaire was arrested and charged with sex trafficking minors, and a series of scandalous new revelations about Barak’s ties to Epstein soon followed. Netanyahu made them the centerpiece of his political offensive against Barak, going so far as to officially request an investigation of him from the attorney general, putting the challenger on the defensive and taking the wind out of the sails of Barak’s attacks on Netanyahu’s own criminal scandals.

Severely damaged by the revelations, Barak’s poorly polling party was forced to form an alliance with several other left-leaning parties to have any hope of winning seats in the Knesset, and he had to essentially take himself out of the running for a cabinet spot to get them over the line. One can only imagine how Epstein’s claimed involvement in that very political project would have further dented its standing, if Netanyahu had been able to use it.

Bannon’s claim to being Barak’s “strategic advisor” was likely a joke, but the two had met at least once before via their mutual connection with Epstein. In a February 2018 email, Epstein asked Kathryn Ruemmler — former White House counsel to Barack Obama who had a mysteriously close relationship with the billionaire sex trafficker — whether Bill Clinton “would like to join you me ehud and steve” in a meeting they had apparently already arranged. (Despite this email already being reported on by outlets like CNBC and the New York Post, each wrongly published the reference to Barak’s first name as “chud,” thereby obscuring his identity).

Upon learning that Epstein had had a hand in Barak’s sudden return to politics a year later, Bannon immediately tried to make himself useful to the former prime minister.

My guy is in Israel– can we connect him to erhud [sic] ???” Bannon asked Epstein. “On it,” Epstein wrote back.

Even with the wealth of material that’s been released, Epstein’s exact relationship to Israel remains unclear, not to mention an answer to the specific question of whether or not he belonged to Israeli intelligence. While the latest disclosures show Epstein had a keen interest in Israel and its politics, they also show he held a similar interest in many countries and regions and had relationships with a variety of power players across the Middle East and around the world.

But what they should mean, at minimum, is an end to the widespread taboo of even asking questions about billionaire sex offender’s links to the Israeli state. Epstein brokered security deals for Israel, had a close friendship with one of its former prime ministers and military officials, and, apparently, even secretly involved himself in the country’s elections. If it were any other country, it would not be remotely scandalous to wonder out loud what it could all mean.

ISRAEL SHELLED PALESTINIANS FOR BEING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE YELLOW LINE AFTER MOVING IT

They Just Keep Finding New Ways To Carve Off More Pieces Of Gaza And Murder More Palestinians. That Should Tell A Lot About The Nature Of The Israeli Regime.

It was reported that the IDF quietly moved part of the “yellow line” which divides Gaza 300 meters forward, and then started shelling Palestinians for being on the “wrong side” of the line.

They just keep finding new ways to carve off more pieces of Gaza and murder more Palestinians.

Haaretz has a disturbing story out about a 14 year-old Palestinian boy who was waiting for his school bus in the West Bank on a quiet street eating a cookie, when suddenly a bunch of IDF vehicles pulled up and a soldier shot him directly in the face with a teargas canister. Then they sped off.

The boy lost his right eye in the attack.

Israelis will just casually shoot a Palestinian kid in the face for no reason, and then go online and call you hateful for opposing them.

Leftists are going to hate Israel for leftist reasons and rightists are going to hate Israel for rightist reasons. This is not a difference that needs to be reconciled or a problem that needs to be solved.

You’ll see Israel supporters point to the rising number of rightists who oppose Israel and trying to marry it to pro-Palestine leftists in some way. Former Israeli spokesman Eylon Levy claimed that antizionism “builds coalitions on both extremes — and increasingly between them — by mobilizing politics against Jews.” But that’s just some nonsense they’re making up in order to justify their genocidal atrocities. Leftist opposition to Israel is about justice, equality, anticolonialism, antiracism, anti-imperialism, antiwar and anti-apartheid activism, and has nothing whatsoever to do with hating Jews. Rightist opposition to Israel is more about nationalism, anti-interventionism, America First ideology, and yes, in many cases a hatred of Jews. These are two completely different things.

You never saw Zionists bitching about the far right until they started pivoting against Israel; until then they were happy to make alliances with them, and still are as long as they remain supportive of Israel. And half the time you see them citing anti-Israel sentiments on the right it’s only to play guilt-by-association by framing them as the same as the pro-Palestine left.

It’s just more empty narrative-diddling from Israel apologists. It’s not a real argument, and doesn’t require a counter-argument. It’s just them flailing around trying anything they can to stop the entire western political spectrum from flushing Israel down the toilet.

War propagandist Bret Stephens has a new article out titled “The Case for Overthrowing Maduro” in which he argues for American regime change interventionism in Venezuela on the basis that “the regime’s close economic and strategic ties to China, Russia and Iran give America’s enemies a significant foothold in the Americas.”

This would be the same Bret Stephens who in 2023 wrote an article in the New York Times titled “20 Years On, I Don’t Regret Supporting the Iraq War,” by the way.

Right wingers think a mother should be at home raising her children, an arrangement that many mothers would be on board with, but if you say this requires either state support or for employers to be forced to increase pay so that single-income families can exist they say “No that’s socialism!”

They want the mothers to stay at home while the fathers work 80-hour work weeks for ten bucks an hour so that billionaires can become trillionaires.

Elon Musk says that in 10 to 20 years work will be optional and money will be meaningless because AI and automation will eliminate the need for labor and make everything wonderful. Something tells me the guy who just took a trillion-dollar pay package from Tesla doesn’t really believe money is going to be meaningless anytime soon.

This soon-to-be-trillionaire whose ego is so fragile and infantile that his AI chatbot tells people he’s smarter than da Vinci and more athletic than LeBron James is asking us to believe that revolutionary change isn’t necessary because capitalists like himself are going to fix it so that everyone lives in luxury.

LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE AMERICAN EMPIRE

The Difference Between People Who Supported The British Empire And Who Support The American Empire Is That Those Who Supported The British Empire Knew They Were Supporting An Empire.

Someone who supported the British Empire’s acts of mass military slaughter around the world did so because they supported the Crown and wanted His Majesty to civilize the godless savages and turn the whole world into his royal subjects. Someone who supports the American empire’s warmongering thinks they are doing so because Saddam is an evil dictator, because Gaddafi is an evil dictator, because Maduro is an evil dictator, because Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis are terrorists, etc.

Supporters of the British Empire understood that the enemies of the Empire were being killed because they refused to adequately subject themselves to the King and his demands. Supporters of the American empire think the American regime and its allies are always attacking Evil Bad Guys in the name of spreading Freedom and Democracy, and if this happens to advance pre-existing geostrategic agendas and/or resource interests then it is purely by coincidence.

Supporters of the British Empire understood that they were living under an actual empire: a power umbrella comprised of colonies, protectorates, dominions, mandates and territories which spanned the globe. Supporters of the American empire think it is entirely by coincidence that there is a giant cluster of nations which happens to move in near-perfect unison on all foreign policy agendas and continually wages war upon nations which are not part of that cluster.

The British Empire was entirely open about what it was. It would conquer a place, tell its inhabitants that they are now British subjects, and make them raise the Union Jack on their flag pole. The western empire which is loosely structured around Washington lets its member states keep their own flag and pretend they’re sovereign nations, while behaving in ways that are not significantly different from the subjects of the British Empire.

The British Empire was open and unapologetic about pilfering resources from the darker-skinned populations it had conquered and using them to improve the lives of people in the imperial core. In the American empire those resources are extracted in the same way, but under cover of slogans like “opening up markets” and “free trade” and “globalization”.

The British Empire was held in place by brute force and overt indoctrination. People were forcibly subjugated and then over the years educated to believe it served their interests to live under the Royal Crown, and if they tried to become independent, the redcoats would be sent in to remind them of His Majesty’s beneficence.

The American regime’s empire is held in place by plenty of brute force as well, but its primary weapon is psychological manipulation. It has the most sophisticated propaganda machine that has ever existed, which trains the minds of its subjects to support all its various agendas of capitalism, militarism, imperialism and global domination under the guise of news media, Hollywood productions, and Silicon Valley tech services. Disobedient nations find their information ecosystems awash with National Endowment for Democracy reeducation media informing them why their current government doesn’t serve their interests, and if that doesn’t work there will be a “revolution” which decades later the CIA will admit to having fomented and armed.

The American empire is a larger, stronger, sneakier, bitchier, less honest, more manipulative version of what the British Empire was. The British Empire told its subjects that they were the property of the King and must do as His Majesty commands. The American regime’s empire subjugates people by tricking them into thinking they are free.

DOCTORS FROM GAZA ARE STILL BEING HELD IN ISRAELI PRISONS

While Some Were Released In The Ceasefire, Israel Still Holds 80 Palestinian Medical Workers Without Charge. Their Families Are Demanding Their Freedom.

When Dr. Ahmad Al-Farra turned his phone camera around in his office at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza, placards reading “Freedom to Dr. Abu Teima” and “We will not leave you” appeared. They were held by Nahed Abu Teima’s wife and children, who have not spoken to him in nearly two years.

Abu Teima was the director of the surgical ward at Nasser Hospital until Israeli forces detained him during a February 2024 raid on the medical complex. His family was addressed after asking Al-Farra, the head of the hospital’s pediatric and maternity ward, what he knew about the seven colleagues taken in that same raid.

Their names appear on a list published by Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI), identifying 17 Gazan doctors — and 80 medical workers overall — who remain in Israeli custody even after Israel’s release of nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees at the start of the ceasefire.

Held without charge or trial in dire conditions, these doctors are denied contact with the outside world, save for infrequent lawyer visits. They face physical violence, medical neglect, and starvation, as a result of which dozens of detainees have died. Yet even when their cases draw significant public attention — like that of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, director of Kamal Adwan Hospital, detained since December 2024 — it has done little to bring about their release.

A few months ago, there was a social media campaign in which Israeli doctors read the testimonies of detained Gazan physicians. They read out the following words: “We need antibiotics and medicines for infections … Sometimes I perform surgeries on prisoners, clean the abscess, open it with a piece of plastic, and disinfect with some chlorine.” It was only after speaking with Abu Teima’s family that it was learned the testimony was his.

Since his detention, Abu Teima has been permitted to see his lawyer only once every six months. After their most recent meeting in early October, the lawyer informed the family that he has lost 25 kilograms, is beaten daily, is told he will never be released, and is being denied his regular blood pressure medication.

At the time of his arrest, Abu Teima had been living with his wife, Arwa, and their nine children inside Nasser Hospital, alongside many other families of medical staff. Israel had destroyed their home in Khan Younis early in the war, and they believed the hospital would offer some protection from the airstrikes.

When the Israeli army raided the medical complex, Abu Teima’s family evacuated but he insisted on staying behind to care for the patients who remained. It was the last time his family saw or spoke to him.

Only in August 2024, with the help of PHRI, did they receive confirmation that he was being held at Ketziot Prison in southern Israel. Their first indirect contact, through a lawyer, came three months later — nearly nine months after his arrest.

Since then, Arwa and the children have been living in a tent in Khan Younis. A practicing gynecologist, she has managed to support the family alone, but it has not been easy: Doctors in Gaza have received no steady salaries since the start of the war, only sporadic lump-sum payments every two to three months

One of her younger sons, Yousef, smiled brightly throughout the conversation despite suffering from heat stroke and an infectious abscess in his leg. When the family came to the hospital to protest for Abu Teima’s release, Al-Farra administered IV fluids and antibiotics; without their connection to the hospital, Yousef’s treatment would have been far harder to secure.

We lose one child in the hospital every day because of a lack of equipment,” Al-Farra told +972. Medications for diabetes, hypertension, and hypothyroidism are scarce. The hospital has run out of test tubes for blood work, and its intensive care units operate without essential infusion equipment.

Although more food has entered Gaza since the ceasefire, Al-Farra explained, staples like meat, milk, eggs, and fresh produce remain largely unavailable. And despite a surge in patients arriving from shuttered hospitals in the north, Nasser has received no additional medical supplies.

EPSTEIN’S TIES TO TRUMP ARE THE FOCUS OF THE MEDIA WHILE THEY IGNORE HIS TIES TO ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE

This Is Such A Perfect Example Of How Western Media Ignore Anything That Doesn’t Fit Neatly Into The Media Worldview That Israel Can Do No Wrong.

If there’s not some kind of partisan angle to it that Democrats can use to attack Republicans or Republicans can use to attack Democrats, it tends to get conspicuously overlooked.

Which just so happens to align nicely with the objectives of the American empire.

The empire doesn’t want people looking too closely at the evil things the American regime and Israel have been doing together regardless of who is in office, so the western press tend to ignore these things wherever possible.

The empire doesn’t want people keeping track of what countries the American regime’s war machine is bombing from administration to administration, so the western press keep this information so silent that every few months I’ll see a viral tweet from some American going “Wait a second we’ve been bombing Somalia this whole time?” or “We’ve got troops in KENYA??”

The overwhelming majority of the empire’s abuses remain in place regardless of which political party happens to be in power or what the current president’s campaign platform was. War. Genocide. Militarism. Imperialist extraction. Ecocidal capitalism. Soaring inequality. Poverty. Homelessness. Police militarization. The ever-expanding surveillance network. Censorship. Propaganda. Government lies and opacity. The crimes of the imperial intelligence alliance.

All of the worst things about our dystopian civilization here in the globe-spanning power structure that is loosely centralized around the United States keep marching forward completely uninterrupted from presidency to presidency, while the mass media ignore them and keep the public fixated on irrelevant feuding between America’s two mainstream political factions.

This is because the mass media of the western world do not exist to report on the major news stories of our day. They exist to indoctrinate, distract, and manipulate. They are not news services, they are propaganda services.

Adding a few more details of Trump’s already well–documented Epstein ties to the information ecosystem will drum up a lot of interest and attention and monopolize political discourse for a day or two, but it won’t change anything. The American public developing a universal revulsion toward Israel and its involvement in their own country’s affairs, however, would have far-reaching consequences that could change the face of the world. Which is why the propaganda services of the empire are focusing on the former rather than the latter.

BECAUSE THEY ARE LOSING CONTROL OF THE NARRATIVE, THE ZIONISTS ARE FREAKING OUT

More And More Often We’re Seeing Them Say The Quiet Parts Out Loud As They Frantically Scramble To Manage Perceptions And Manipulate Minds Around The World.

Former Obama speechwriter Sarah Hurwitz made some very revealing remarks during an appearance at the Jewish Federations of North America General Assembly on Sunday, expressing frustration with the way younger Jews are dismissing pro-Israel arguments because of the carnage they’ve seen in Gaza.

We are now wrestling with a new I think generational divide here, and I think that’s particularly true in that social media is now our source of media,” Hurwitz said. “It used to be that the news you got in America was American media, and it was pretty mainstream; you know it generally didn’t express extreme anti-Israel views. You had to go to a pretty weird bookstore to find global media and fringe media. But today we have social media, which is the global medium; its algorithms are shaped by billions of people worldwide who don’t really love Jews. So while in the 1990s a young person probably wasn’t going to find Al Jazeera or someone like Nick Fuentes, today those media outlets find them; they find them on their phones.”

It’s also this increasingly post-literate media; less and less text, more and more videos,” Hurwitz continued. “So you have TikTok just smashing our young people’s brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza. And this is why so many of us cannot have a sane conversation with younger Jews, because anything that we try to say to them, they are hearing it through this wall of carnage. So I want to give data and information and facts and arguments, and they are just seeing in their minds: carnage. And I sound obscene.”

Hurwitz went on to say that Holocaust education has begun backfiring, because it has been giving young people the wrong impression that genocide is always bad.

And you know I think unfortunately, the very smart bet that we made on Holocaust education to serve as anti-semitism education in this new media environment, I think that is beginning to break down a little bit because, you know, Holocaust education is absolutely essential, but I think it may be confusing some of our young people about antisemitism,” Hurwitz said. “Because they learn about big, strong Nazis hurting weak, emaciated Jews, and they think oh, antisemitism is like anti-black racism, right? Powerful white people against powerless black people. So, when on TikTok all day long, they see powerful Israelis hurting weak, skinny Palestinians, it’s not surprising that they think, Oh, I know the lesson of the Holocaust is you fight Israel. You fight the big powerful people hurting the weak people.”

It’s just so fascinating to see a former White House speechwriter making so many of the points that anti-Zionists have been making for years, but taking the exact opposite meaning from them:

  • The mainstream legacy media has always hidden anti-Israel views from the public — and that was a good thing.

  • Social media has now given Palestinians the ability to expose the truth about Israel’s abuses — and that’s a bad thing.

  • People aren’t falling for the Zionist spin and narrative-diddling anymore because they’ve seen the carnage in Gaza with their own eyes — and that’s a problem.

  • People who learned from Holocaust education that genocide is wrong have been applying those same lessons to the genocide in Gaza — and this means they’re “confused”.

     

Hurwitz isn’t denying Israel’s abuses or framing its genocidal atrocities as the problem, she’s just coming right out and saying that people obtaining information and moral clarity about those abuses is the problem. The atrocities aren’t wrong, what’s wrong is people seeing those atrocities and calling them what they are.

She complains that she looks “obscene” for trying to lay out arguments and narratives justifying the Gaza holocaust for people who’ve seen the “wall of carnage” from the genocide. Yes obviously you’re going to look obscene if you try to tell someone why raw video footage of massacres, mutilated children and emaciated bodies is actually showing something that is justifiable and acceptable.

You can’t stand in front of a pile of child corpses justifying their murder and then whine when people ignore your spinmeistering and keep staring at the tiny bodies. That’s like murdering an entire family and then telling the cops, “But you’re not listening to my reasons for killing them!” They’re doing the normal thing while you are being obscene.

There’s a viral clip of this tirade going around Twitter and some were curious if Hurwitz had said anything after the video segment ended which might have made what she said sound less horrible, after checking out the original video on the Jewish Federations of North America’s Youtube channel, it turned out that nope. It didn’t get any better.

Hurwitz went on to say that people are wrong to carry the lessons of Holocaust education into opposition to Israel’s genocidal atrocities because the Holocaust was Nazi Germany blaming Jews for all their problems in the same way people think Israel is the source of all the world’s problems today.

She then mourned the way western Jews “re-imagined Judaism as a Protestant-style religion” in order to integrate into western society rather than retaining a strong identity that is loyal to the state of Israel.

The problem is, we’re not just a religion,” Hurwitz said. “We’re a nation. Civilization. Tribe. Peoplehood. But most of all we’re a family. And so if you are a young person raised in America who thinks Judaism is a Protestant-style religion, then the seven million Jews in Israel are merely your co-religionists. So my co-religionists, if I look at them and they’re not practicing my religion of social justice and certain prophetic values then what do I have to do with them?”

But that’s a category error,” says Hurwitz. “The seven million people in Israel, they are not my co-religionists, they are my siblings. But I think if you think of them as merely your co-religionists, it’s easy to slide into anti-Zionism. You don’t necessarily have that connection to them.”

Hurwitz is saying here that Jews around the world should be loyal to Israel no matter what Israel does, not because that’s the moral or truthful position but because Israel is where their loyalties belong.

We don’t know about you, but if our siblings were murdering civilians we would immediately become their enemy. We wouldn’t defend my brothers if they were going around shooting children in the head like IDF snipers have been doing in Gaza, in fact we would feel a special responsibility to stop them exactly because they are my brothers. Genocide doesn’t magically become acceptable if the perpetrators are your “siblings”, unless you are a sociopath.

It’s just incredible how hard Zionists have been freaking out about the way Israel has lost control of the narrative these last two years. More and more often we’re seeing them say the quiet parts out loud as they frantically scramble to manage perceptions and manipulate minds around the world.

Many things which used to be hidden are finding their way into the light.

HUNDREDS DETAINED AS ISRAEL RAIDS DOZENS OF HOMES IN A WEST BANK TOWN

The Israeli Army Reportedly Turned The Municipal Stadium Into A Makeshift Holding And Interrogation Site. Videos Showed Israeli Soldiers Escorting Bound Palestinians Inside The Town.

The Israeli army detained about 100 Palestinians in the town of Beit Ummar, north of Hebron (al-Khalil) in the southern occupied West Bank, after sealing all of the town’s entrances early on Wednesday, it was reported.

The raid came hours after an illegal Israeli settler was killed and three others were wounded, one critically, in a ramming and stabbing operation at the Gush Etzion junction in the southern West Bank. The operation was carried out by two Palestinians, one of them from Beit Ummar, who were shot dead by Israeli forces, the report noted.

On Tuesday, the Palestinian Health Ministry said the Palestinian Civil Affairs Authority – the official liaison with Israel – notified it that Imran al-Atrash from Hebron and Walid Mohammed Sabarneh from Beit Ummar were killed by Israeli fire near Bethlehem in the southern West Bank.

DOZENS OF HOMES RAIDED

Israeli forces stormed Beit Ummar early on Wednesday and raided dozens of homes, including the Sabarneh family’s house, damaging its contents, witnesses said.

They said the army launched a broad arrest campaign in the town, detaining about 100 people.

According to the witnesses, the army turned the municipal stadium into a makeshift holding and interrogation site.

Videos circulating online showed Israeli soldiers escorting bound Palestinians inside the town.

ENTRY AND EXIT RESTRICTED

Residents said the army sealed all entrances to Beit Ummar with dirt mounds and iron gates, restricting movement in and out of the area. It was reported that ambulances were unable to enter or exit the town.

According to the Palestinian Prisoners Society (PPS), the field interrogations were accompanied by torture and severe beatings, a news agency reported.

The occupation forces also stole money and gold jewelry, confiscated vehicles and electronic devices, turned homes into military points, using residents as human shields, and distributed leaflets containing direct threats against the residents, the report stated.

HANAN AL-BARGHOUTI ABUSED IN DETENTION

Meanwhile, the Prisoners’ Media Office reported that the Palestinian detainee Hanan Al-Barghouti is being subjected to repressive measures, abuse, and continuous starvation in Damon prison.

She also suffers from “the policy of repeated revolving-door detention” which involves the arrest and release of detainees several times, often without charge or trial. The Media Office urged human rights organizations to campaign for her release.

Barghouti was freed from detention in December 2024 and rearrested in April this year, and again in September this year. She was also freed in November 2023 as part of the prisoner exchange deal with Israel.

Hailing from the village of Kobar in Ramallah, Hanan is the sister of Nael Barghouti, who was previously the longest-held Palestinian prisoner until his release and deportation in the February 2025 prisoner exchange.

ESCALATING ATTACKS

The Israeli army has escalated its attacks in the West Bank since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023.

More than 1,076 Palestinians have since been killed, and 10,700 others injured in attacks by the army and illegal settlers in the occupied territory. More than 20,500 people have also been arrested.

In a landmark opinion last July, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and called for the evacuation of all settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

AMERICANS DON’T WANT WAR WITH VENEZUELA – ASK THEM

Reports Say The President Is Preparing To Attack, As Lawmakers Ignore Their Constituents And Refuse To Stand In The Way Of The Armed Robbery Of Venezuela’s Massive Oil Reserves.

As the Trump administration’s made-for-Hollywood strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats have dominated the news, the Pentagon has been positioning military assets in the Caribbean and Latin America and reactivating bases in the region. More recently, The Washington Post reported that high-level meetings were held about a possible imminent attack on Venezuela and The New York Times has learned that the president gave authorization for CIA operations there.

There is one problem: Americans don’t seem to be very enthusiastic.

While voters returned Donald Trump to office in 2024 based on a host of campaign promises, his faithful took his long-voiced complaints about spending on foreign aid and entanglement in overseas wars as vows to focus on the homeland. A range of Americans are in sync with his past statements about avoiding war; opposition to military intervention abroad is common for the left and right. Simply put, the public is not interested in going to war. Indeed, one recent poll found that just 15% of American adults support invading Venezuela.

Some see Trump’s Venezuela moves as an attempt to distract from domestic policy failures or the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, but his actions can’t be dismissed as wagging the dog. Trump has shown himself willing to engage with militarism. It’s not just “drug boats,” and it’s not just Venezuela. He has spent 2025 belying the myth, which has persisted over his three campaigns for president, that he is averse to war-making.

WHAT POLLS SAY ABOUT VENEZUELA

The public has mixed views on some of the Trump administration’s specific actions toward Venezuela. Asked in a recent YouGov poll about the Navy’s presence in Caribbean waters, for example, the percentage who approve (30%) was not much lower than the percentage who disapprove (37%).

Framing its actions against the South American nation as narcotics enforcement seems to have benefited the administration: A poll in early October found 71% of registered voters in favor of “the US destroying boats bringing drugs into the United States from South America.” Different wording — and perhaps media coverage of the continued boat strikes raising issues of their necessity, legality, and effect — could help explain why a poll in mid-November found only 29% answered yes to the question, “Should the U.S. government kill suspected drug traffickers abroad without judicial process?”

Importantly, however, in a survey, roughly two-thirds of American adults said they oppose an invasion of Venezuela and, as noted above, only 15% support one. Over half oppose the American regime using the military to overthrow the country’s president, Nicolás Maduro.

A 2023 survey found a souring of views of military intervention more broadly, with growing numbers believing that intervention by the American regime tends to “worsen situations.” Respondents seem to have based this on more recent examples, including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Syrian and Yemeni civil wars. None of these interventions were seen by the majority of those polled as “successful” uses of American forces abroad.

A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Overall, Americans do not want to get, to use Trump’s own words, “bogged down” in foreign wars. Public opinion on intervention appears driven by a cost-benefit analysis as John Mueller, Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Ohio State University describes it. This may be why some Americans are more willing to accept action in the form of targeted strikes such as the boat bombings and limited displays of military might.

Since the Cold War and especially the 9/11 attacks, America has become increasingly militarized. One measure of this, of course, is government spending. The Costs of War project estimates that the American regime has spent $8 trillion as a result of the post-9/11 wars. The $22 billion in support for Israel’s war in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023 is one of the latest and most egregious instances of the American regime’s support for a military first approach.

Unfortunately, the official end of the post-9/11 wars was not the end of their financial costs to ordinary Americans. The percent of the discretionary federal budget devoted to the military continues to rise and at the expense of domestic programs. Pentagon spending alone in 2026 will jump to well over $1 trillion. Though many of the economic costs of war are hidden and/or deferred to an indeterminate future — especially when they are funded through deficit spending — Americans still rightly worry about getting involved in costly conflicts like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

CAN PUBLIC OPINION HALT TRUMP’S MILITARISM?

Many have taken note of how Congress’s passage of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force has helped concentrate power in the executive, enabling swifter, unilateral military deployment by the commander-in-chief. With the AUMF, Congress relinquished its constitutionally assigned war powers and ceded to the president its duty to decide whether, when, and where to use the military to combat terrorism. Since then, the executive branch has conducted counterterrorism activities in an astounding 78 countries.

Despite Americans’ low trust in Congress, they nonetheless want the president to seek congressional approval before going to war. Feeding their mistrust, Congress has failed to respond to them on this crucial issue.

Look at how a compliant Congress has abdicated responsibility for oversight of the bombings in the Caribbean — which have now killed more than 83 people — as the Pentagon arrays warships, missiles, drones, and jet fighters in the region. Senate Republicans voted down legislation that would have required Trump to get their approval for any attacks on Venezuela, blatantly ignoring the disapproval of a public they are meant to represent.

So the bombings and the build-up continue, with Trump matter-of-factly telling a journalist, “We’re just going to kill people” without seeking congressional approval.

In the end, Trump may not attack Venezuela, but it likely won’t be because the people are against it. He is in the process of commandeering all armed capacities of the American government, military, and law enforcement to serve his purposes foreign and domestic. Reasserting the rights of the people, including the right to peace, requires Congress to aggressively reassert its constitutional duty and the citizenry to demand its will be met.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started