IT IS NOT OKAY TO STILL BELIEVE THE LIES ABOUT GAZA IN AUGUST OF 2025 IF YOU ARE A GROWN ADULT

It’s Not Okay To Be A Grown Adult With Internet Access In August 2025 And Still Believe This Mass Atrocity And Genocide Is About Self-Defense.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe this mass atrocity is about self-defense.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that people in Gaza are not being deliberately starved by Israel.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that Israel destroyed Gaza’s entire healthcare system because there were Hamas bases in every part of that healthcare system.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that Israel is banning foreign journalists from entering Gaza because it is concerned for the journalists’ safety.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that Israel has been killing a record-shattering number of journalists in Gaza because all of those journalists were Hamas.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that Israel has been killing a shocking number of civilians in Gaza because Hamas is using civilians as human shields.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that unproven claims made by Israeli officials about what’s happening in Gaza should be considered plausible until proven false.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that this mass atrocity is about hostages, or is about Hamas, or is about October 7th, or is about anything besides the long-sought agenda to remove Palestinians from a Palestinian territory.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe this is a very complicated issue.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still believe that this all started on October 7th.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still frame an active genocide as a moral gray area with bad actors on both sides.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still say you don’t know enough about Gaza to have an opinion one way or the other.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still support Israel.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still support Donald Trump.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and still support the western power alliance.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and not be outraged at what you are seeing.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and not be doing everything you can to end this nightmare.

It’s not okay to be a grown adult with internet access in August 2025 and not be doing everything you can to make sure that nothing like this can ever happen again.

AMERICA STAGED AN ALL-STAR FOOTBALL GAME IN THE FALLOUT ZONE AFTER BOMBING NAGASAKI

On New Year’s Day, 1946, One Of The Most Surreal And Disturbing Sporting Events In American History Was Held In The Japanese City Of Nagasaki.

Less than five months after an dropping atomic bomb on August 9th that destroyed half the city and killed at least 75,000 people the game was staged by the occupying forces of the American military.

The game received wide coverage in the American media at the time and was dubbed the Atomic Bowl.

Then it became largely forgotten, almost lost to history.

As we approach the 80th anniversary of this attack, this game remains an appropriate metaphor for the Nagasaki bomb, the second nuclear weapon dropped on a large Japanese city by the United States at the end of World War II. This horrific bombing and its aftermath has long been overshadowed by the first atomic blast three days earlier at Hiroshima.

In late September 1945, shortly after the Japanese surrender that ended the war, tens of thousands of American Army troops and Marines landed near Nagasaki in southern Japan. They found the city decimated—the bomb had exploded a mile off target over a suburb where 15,000 Catholics had lived—with countless survivors injured or suffering from radiation disease. Many of the Americans were exposed to lingering (and poorly monitored) levels of radiation in the ruins.

What were we doing here, happily celebrating an American holiday…on a grotesque golgotha so recently hallowed by horror? The question had no answer.”

Since the end of hostilities, American commanders had looked for ways to normalize the American occupation in the Pacific and Europe. A military orientation film, Our Job in Japan, (written by Theodore Geisel, who later became Dr. Seuss) was shown to arriving members of the occupying forces. It told them their main job was “to be ourselves” and show that “the American way…was a pretty good way to live.” This included mounting baseball and football games in which American soldiers could compete. Military officials believed this was also a way for servicemen, as one put it, to “blow off steam” and impress the locals with the glory of American sports.

In December, a Marine commander ordered that a football game be held in Japan for the Christmas and New Year’s holidays. Why did the military choose Nagaskai of all places as the site for this game, on a field so close to ground zero? No written records documenting the reasons exist. Additionally, later in 1946, American servicemen helped organize—and served as judges for—a Miss Atom Bomb beauty pageant in Nagasaki for local women.

One of the organizers of the Atomic Bowl football contest, Lt. Gerald Sanders later noted that the game was a kind of tribute to fallen colleagues. “We thought it would be totally appropriate,” he said. “It was certainly not to look like there was a joyful glee in what had happened there… We were there, yet we had many buddies that didn’t make it through the war.”

A gridiron was cleared in front of a middle school which had lost 162 students and 13 teachers to the atomic bomb. Angelo Bertelli, who had won the Heisman Trophy in 1943 as quarterback for Notre Dame, and “Bullet Bill” Osmanski, the Chicago Bears’ star running back, were selected as captains. A top officer wrote a press release promising that the game would have “all the color—and more” of the bowl games to be played that day back in the States. On hand would be a Marine band and Japanese girl cheerleaders.

But they would have to play touch, not tackle, football because shards from the atomic blast still littered the field.

On an unusually chilly day in Nagasaki, about 1,500 servicemen gathered to watch the spectacle. “Here and there were isolated Japanese—a father and his boy, a group of giggly girls, two old men—all looking small and lost and bewildered by it all,” one observer, a Naval officer, wrote in a letter to his wife.

The result was hardly important—Osmanski scored a late touchdown and kicked the extra point for the 14-13 win—but for two days the game was covered widely in America. Then no one wrote about it. At all. No photos and no footage emerged. This lack of subsequent attention reflected Nagasaki’s second-class atomic status. In coming decades, American journalists and notables frequently visited Hiroshima, but they rarely trekked to Nagasaki, which the locals referred to as “the inferior A-bomb city.”

Even the players in the briefly celebrated game were reluctant to discuss it. Growing up, Robert Bertelli never once heard his father talk about playing in an all-star football match in Japan in 1946. Angelo would die in 1999 at the age of 78, and his son—by then known as Bob Bert, a drummer who was a member of the influential rock group Sonic Youth—never heard him mention the game. The former quarterback never spoke about it in interviews. Neither did Osmanski.

The offspring of other players in this game had not been told anything about it by their fathers. This sports stunt disappeared from journalism and history for decades.

Finally, in 1984, one of the Atomic Bowl’s attendees, William Watt, a Navy officer, poet, and literature professor, wrote a short piece for the New York Times’ sports section describing the game and his reaction at the time: “What were we doing here, happily celebrating an American holiday…on a grotesque golgotha so recently hallowed by horror? The question had no answer.”

While a large segment of the American public continues to support the use of the first atomic bomb at Hiroshima, historians have debated that decision. Some have especially questioned the second bombing. For example, Martin Sherwin, a Pulitzer Prize winner for co-authoring, with Kai Bird, the biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer, American Prometheus, called the Nagasaki attack “gratuitous at best…and genocidal at worst.”

The disappearance of the Atomic Bowl and the relegation of Nagasaki to an afterthought of Hiroshima raises the question of whether there are lessons from the second atomic attack that extend beyond those prompted by the Hiroshima bombing.

Nearly all of the victims of the Nagasaki bombing were non-combatants, mainly women and children and the elderly, as well as many foreign workers who had been seized and sent to Japan to work in arms factories. Hiroshima did host a major military base—a fact long used to justify the tremendous loss of civilian life there. The bombing of Nagasaki, which was added as a target at nearly the last-minute, showed that civilian casualties could be completely ignored. So much so that a football game could even be played by Americans on one of the killing fields.

The Nagasaki bombing is a reminder, perhaps more so than Hiroshima, that a military attack on a large city, killing tens of thousands of civilians, can become morally accepted not just by civilian and military leaders, but by the public. Some polls in the past have showed that many if not most Americans would today support an American nuclear strike that might kill massive numbers of civilians in, for instance, North Korea.

As we currently witness massive civilian casualties in wars from Africa to Ukarine to Gaza—more kids dead than soldiers in some cases—there’s good reason for the second atomic bombing to receive as much attention as the first.

THE CASE AGAINST THE ATOMIC BOMB FROM GEORGE ORWELL

In October 1945, George Orwell Wrote An Article Titled “You And The Atom Bomb” For The Socialist Publication Tribune.

Orwell’s piece makes a compelling argument against the atomic bomb, noting the myriad ways in which it maximizes state power and enables a handful of empires:

From various symptoms one can infer that the Russians do not yet possess the secret of making the atomic bomb; on the other hand, the consensus of opinion seems to be that they will possess it within a few years. So we have before us the prospect of two or three monstrous super-states, each possessed of a weapon by which millions of people can be wiped out in a few seconds, dividing the world between them. It has been rather hastily assumed that this means bigger and bloodier wars, and perhaps an actual end to the machine civilisation. But suppose—and really this the likeliest development—that the surviving great nations make a tacit agreement never to use the atomic bomb against one another? Suppose they only use it, or the threat of it, against people who are unable to retaliate? In that case we are back where we were before, the only difference being that power is concentrated in still fewer hands and that the outlook for subject peoples and oppressed classes is still more hopeless.”

In spite of his commitment to democratic socialism, Orwell’s contentions here are decidedly libertarian. At the core of his polemic is the premise that nuclear weapons grease the wheels of statism by allowing the world’s superpowers to hold the global population hostage. Orwell dispels the most optimistic argument put forward by proponents of the atomic bomb, namely that such technology would inaugurate a new era of peace. That peace, however, would be maintained by the threat of mutual assured destruction. The ruling class would be permitted to amass even more power, all while waving the banner of “peace through strength” and stockpiling tens of thousands of nuclear warheads. The threat of nuclear war would facilitate the exponential growth of the state. Rather than reaping a peace dividend, it would use the prospect of nuclear annihilation to expand its empire, thereby exerting its awesome tyranny over both its own citizenry and billions of foreign civilians.

It should come as no surprise that the advent of the atomic bomb kicked off a period of heightened American military intervention abroad. The Cold War undoubtedly fueled that trend, but at the heart of the Cold War was an arms race that nuclear technology accelerated. For over forty years, the world’s two greatest superpowers sought to expand their influence over weaker states. Rather than discourage military aggression, the availability of atomic weapons encouraged the United States to embark on costlier, deadlier foreign adventures. The prospect of mutual assured destruction meant that neither the United States nor the Soviet Union had any incentive to back down or avoid conflict. Both powers, bolstered by their respective nuclear arsenals, felt inclined to pursue militaristic agendas with relative impunity.

When the Cold War ended, the specter of nuclear annihilation receded, at least temporarily. But the September 11th “terrorist” attacks allowed the George W. Bush administration to tap into the American public’s fears of a nuclear holocaust. The unipolar moment posed no hindrance to the neoconservative lobby. It convinced the American public that Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapon. 73% of Americans supported the initial invasion of Iraq precisely because they believed that the United States risked eventual nuclear attack if it didn’t launch a preventive war. In the two decades since, American military interventionism has only grown more brazen. Much in the same way that the Iron Dome incentivizes Israel to pursue a belligerent foreign policy, America’s vast nuclear arsenal allows the American regime to sidestep any concerns that its actions abroad will engender blowback.

At the end of his article, Orwell writes:

Had the atomic bomb turned out to be something as cheap and easily manufactured as a bicycle or an alarm clock, it might well have plunged us back into barbarism, but it might, on the other hand, have meant the end of national sovereignty and of the highly-centralised police State. If, as seems to be the case, it is a rare and costly object as difficult to produce as a battleship, it is likelier to put an end to large-scale wars at the cost of prolonging indefinitely a ‘peace that is no peace.’”

Orwell correctly deduces the paradox at the heart of the Cold War. In actuality, it was a series of hot wars marked by a lack of direct hostilities between the United States and the Soviet Union. And like all hot wars, it necessitated the erosion of individual liberties and the deployment of propaganda to expand the national security state and its military apparatus. The costliness of the atomic bomb—the American government spent the modern equivalent of $30 billion on the Manhattan Project—meant a compounding of state power, one that would further exacerbate the asymmetry between government authority and individual liberty. After all, an atomic bomb is too expensive a weapon to be attained by anybody without access to a wealthy government’s revenue stream. As a result, it proved incapable of erasing the “distinction between great states and small states.” Nor did it crystallize a future in which the “power of the State over the individual would have been greatly weakened.” On the contrary, it strengthened the health of the state.

Technology is often the handmaiden of authoritarianism. Whether it takes the form of the atomic bomb, mass surveillance, social media, or artificial intelligence, technology has a habit of accelerating statist trends, rendering the citizen more and more powerless. The more complicated a technology becomes, the more difficult it becomes for the individual to reproduce it, and the more burdensome it becomes for non-elites to harness its potential in service of non-statist aims. Orwell’s warning of “two or three monstrous super-states” holding the world captive with their nuclear weapons has proven prophetic. As Libertarian Institute Director Scott Horton argues, the only recourse is abolition.

JULIAN ASSANGE JOINED SYDNEY GAZA HUMANITARIAN PROTEST AS THOUSANDS CROSS BRIDGE

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Was Among The Tens Of Thousands Of Protesters In Australia Staging A “Humanitarians For Gaza” March Across The Sydney Harbour Bridge.

The transparency media campaigner and activist, who moved back to his native Australia last year, after reaching a plea deal with the American government to avoid possible life imprisonment for publishing classified anti-war government information, was not expected to speak at the protest.

The bridge was closed for Australia’s biggest pro-Palestine march.

Protesters marched across the bridge this afternoon after the Supreme Court of New South Wales refused an application by police to ban the demonstration.

Police had raised concerns about public safety and the potential for a “crowd crush”, but Justice Belinda Rigg sided with the organizers, finding that they had convincingly explained the reasons why they believed the Israeli genocide in Gaza demanded an urgent response.

Palestine Action Group Sydney, the organizer of the march, said before the protest that it expected 50,000 people to attend. However, heavy rain was a dampener but thousands still marched onto the bridge with estimates being put at between 25,000 and 100,000.

The activist group said it wanted to highlight what the United Nations has described as worsening famine conditions in Gaza.

News media reported that the Israeli military had killed at least 62 people in Gaza yesterday, including 38 people desperately seeking food aid.

A 17-year-old Palestinian was reported to have died of starvation, one of at least seven Palestinians who died of malnutrition within the past 24 hours across Gaza, report medical sources.

The death toll from Israel’s 22-month war on the besieged enclave has reached at least 61,709, including including 17,492 children.

TED CRUZE CHRISTIANS BETRAYED THE INNOCENTS

True Followers Of Christ Cannot Support The Killing And Starvation Of Gaza’s Children. Trump Could, By Stopping Military Assistance To Israel And Demanding An End To The War, Halt This Tragedy Immediately.

The whole world is witnessing the horror of the intentional starvation and killing of innocent children and women in Palestine. These grisly policies are supported by many Zionist Christians such as Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who claims he is biblically directed to support Israel.

On Sunday, another steadfast Israel supporter, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R- SC), outlined one of its options: “I think Israel’s come to conclude that they can’t achieve a goal of ending the war with Hamas that would be satisfactory to the safety of Israel and that they’re going to do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin.” (Will this include firebombing?)

On Tuesday, self-professed Christian Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) posted the following on X: “Israel has no responsibility to provide any kind of aid into Gaza. They are repeatedly held to a different standard than the rest of the world.” That’s been Cotton’s consistent view throughout the Gaza war. Back in April 2024 he declared that “Israel has no responsibility to provide aid to Gaza.” Note: Western countries and the United Nations seek to provide aid to Gazans, but it must pass through Israeli checkpoints.

House speaker and vocal evangelical Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) has also been a reliable supporter of the Israeli government throughout its assault on Gaza. “These calls for a ceasefire are outrageous,” he declared in November 2023. He must have missed a few Bible studies working so hard to maintain the Israel First agenda.

The American Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Tuesday compared France’s recognizing the state of Palestine as “letting the Nazis have a victory after World War 2.”

Conservative columnist Kurt Schlichter, who identifies as a Christian, wants to “mercilessly annihilate Hamas and its allies.”

Another conservative, Will Chamberlain, vice president of external affairs for The Edmund Burke Foundation, which claims to promote Christian values, on Monday said, “There is no more ridiculous spectacle than ‘right-wing’ accounts whining about the plight of the Palestinians.”

Perhaps Chamberlain’s foundation should consider sending him back to Sunday school. In fact, from the looks of it, all of these Ted Cruz Christians would be well advised to turn to their Bibles. As Matthew 6:24 says, “You cannot serve two masters.” That may be especially the case when the other master is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose war policies are in contradiction to the teachings and example of Jesus Christ.

Jesus declared, “Let the children come to me” (Matthew 19:14), yet these Christians turn a blind eye as Gazans, including the youngest among them, face starvation. “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” (Matthew 5:9) stands in stark contrast to their war fervor. And in Micah 6:8, we are urged to “act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God”—a call these leaders ignore as they submissively demonstrate loyalty to foreign powers over the lessons of Jesus Christ (and over the interests of the nation they ostensibly represent).

Many Christian Zionists enable and support a policy that would make Marie Antoinette blush, offering no cake but only starvation and death.

Scripture says Jesus is the bread of life. When we partake of Him, we shall not hunger for worldly ambition and political power. Instead, we love the least of these as he did. Jesus says his power is made perfect in weakness. Christ is found amongst the Gazans stripped of their homes, their possessions, their lives, and now even their food.

Jesus, the fulfillment of the covenant—not Netanyahu—must guide our path. President Donald Trump, by stopping military assistance to Israel and demanding an end to the Gaza war, could halt this tragedy immediately. Until then, the indelible black mark on our nation grows darker, a testament to a faith betrayed.

DID YOU KNOW ISRAEL IS STARVING GAZA?

According To The Gaza Health Ministry, 111 People Have Died From Malnutrition Since The War Began, Most Of Them Children. Alarmingly, 43 Of Those Deaths Occurred Just In The Past Week.

The United Nations reports that the share of children suffering from severe malnutrition has jumped from 2.4 percent in February to 8.8 percent in the first two weeks of July. These figures have been backed by more and more reports by foreign and Palestinian doctors, journalists and international organizations of children and adults dying of hunger.

Spokespeople for the Israel Defense Forces and the government are trying to blur the reality, but even Israel’s official numbers confirm the hunger in Gaza. The IDF claimed this week that 71 trucks carrying food have entered Gaza every day over the past month.

That means each of those trucks is supposed to deliver enough food to feed 30,000 people a day. You don’t need to be familiar with the logistics of food delivery or the laws of war to know that this is tantamount to starvation.

The famine also emerges from figures provided by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which was supposed to solve the food shortage in the Strip. The GHF says that it has distributed 85 million meals since it began operations two months ago.

However, a simple calculation shows that during that period, Gazans would have needed 353 million meals to stave off hunger. And that does not even take into account the problems of food distribution and access for the most needy, as well as the impossibility of extracting the nutritional value of the meals in the absence of cooking gas and under the conditions of displacement.

The famine that has been created is another facet of Israel’s cruel inhumanity towards the people of Gaza. It constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity and is a clear violation of the orders issued a year and a half ago by the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

The famine does not contribute anything to the war effort against Hamas. Its gunmen will be the last to suffer hunger in Gaza. Before that, it will be children, women and Israeli hostages still captive there who starve.

DESPITE AN OFFICIAL BAN, CANADA IS STILL ARMING ISRAEL A REPORT FINDS

In The Course Of A Week, Canada Accused Israel Of Violating International Law, Announced Ottawa Will Recognize A Palestinian State, And Sent Aid To Be Airlifted To Gaza.

But a shocking new report makes clear that Trump’s proposed 51st state still arms Israel’s death machine.

Canada sent at least 391 shipments containing bullets, military equipment, weapons parts, aircraft components, and communication devices to Israel since late 2023, despite Ottawa’s repeated claims to have ended weapons deliveries to the apartheid state, a new report has revealed.

By sifting through data from the Israel Tax Authority, researchers at Arms Embargo Now discovered what they called “a continuous, massive pipeline of Canadian weapons flowing directly to Israel” comprising over 400,000 bullets, multiple shipments of cartridges, and a variety of parts for Israel’s fleet of F-35 fighter jets. Since mid-2024, Israel received four shipments of Doppler Velocity Sensors, which provide navigation data needed for the F-35’s target acquisition and weapons delivery systems, five shipments of lightweight composite panels used by the planes, and two shipments of Modular Product Testers, which are used to diagnose problems on Israel’s air force fleet.

Of the 391 deliveries identified, the report’s authors were able to track direct 47 shipments of military gear with detailed commercial shipping records sent by Canadian companies to Israeli companies. 38 of those shipments were sent to Israel’s biggest military firm, Elbit Systems, and its various subsidiaries.

In March 2024, the previous Canadian administration claimed to have halted all permits for arms shipments to Tel Aviv, after the legislature passed a non-binding motion declaring that “Israel must respect international humanitarian law” and that “the price of defeating Hamas cannot be the continuous suffering of all Palestinian civilians.” In the following months, then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau insisted Canada no longer facilitated Israel’s horrors, going as far as publicly chiding one concerned Palestinian, “we’ve stopped exports of arms to Israel.”

But just before the apparent shift in policy, Ottawa greenlit a massive number of permits for Israeli-bound weapons deliveries, front-loading hundreds of orders in an apparent attempt to preemptively circumvent their own ban. Of the $30.6 million in military equipment sent to Israel in 2023 – the highest yearly total on record – $28.5 million was approved between October and December. Even today, many of those shipments continue to be fulfilled. To date, just 30 permits for military deliveries have been cancelled by Canada, which made that decision following a similar move by the UK in mid-2024 after the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel was violating international law.

The Canadian government appears to have pursued a strategy of rushing through a record-breaking number of arms export permit approvals to Israel prior to publicly committing to pause approving any new ones,” Arm Embargo Now explained in their report. “This was then quietly undermined by a series of exceptions and loopholes,” researchers wrote, suggesting “the government’s policy shifts were… aimed at diffusing public criticism while maintaining material support.”

Other Canadian institutions to have assisted Israel’s genocidal siege include a number of its universities. A separate report published by Just Peace Advocates found that in 2023 up to $100 million went completely untaxed as it was funneled to Israeli universities from their ‘charitable’ arms in Canada. The money went to a variety of schools with strong ties to occupation forces, including Israel’s self-described “academic home of soldiers,” Bar-Ilan University, which took in around $4 million that year.

In addition, nearly $17 million was sent tax-free to Ben-Gurion University in 2023, which bragged of having “transformed itself into a back office for war” in October that year. Months later, Ben-Gurion announced the creation of two new “elite academic programs for future [Israeli military] recruits, as part of preparations for the transfer of IDF technological units to southern Israel.” The university says it works “in tandem” with the Israeli Air Force Flight School and claims to have trained around 1,000 pilots for military service.

Also receiving untaxed funds was Israel’s Weizmann Institute of Science, which has been described as “the incubator of most nuclear weapons work in Israel.” Weizmann has well-documented ties to a variety of Israeli spies implicated in efforts to steal nuclear secrets, and drew international attention after it was partially destroyed in a retaliatory Iranian airstrike on June 15th.

According to Just Peace Advocates, Canadian sources delivered over $36 million to the Weizmann Institute in 2023.

“NO NO, WE’RE STARVING SICK KIDS!” IS A WINNING ARGUMENT ACCORDING TO ISRAELI APOLOGISTS

Israel Is Killing Disabled Kids Depriving Them Of Food And Medical Care, And Its Defenders Are Claiming This Makes Israel Look Like The Heroes Not The Villains.

Some people will probably spend the foreseeable future periodically reminding the world that when everyone was angry at Israel for starving children in Gaza, Israel’s apologists spent days loudly proclaiming that no, they were actually just starving sick children.

As their defense they said this. They actually believed this helped their case.

Let’s go back a bit.

On Wednesday, The New York Times posted an editor’s note on an article it had published the previous Friday which included a horrifying photo of an emaciated child named Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq. Caving to pressure from Zionists and influence ops like the Israeli propaganda outlet HonestReporting, the Times went out of its way to clarify that al-Mutawaq “had pre-existing health problems,” which Israel apologists instantly and predictably spun as proof that the media are lying about Israel starving Gaza.

Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennet claimed that The New York Times was guilty of “a blood libel in 2025.”

Israeli media outlets like The Times of Israel, The Jerusalem Post, i24 News, YNET and Israel Hayom went ballistic, as did Jewish News Syndicate.

New York Times stunningly rolls back claims about viral photo of starving Gaza boy,” reads a New York Post headline.

New York Times admits using misleading cover photo of emaciated Gaza child,” blared Fox News.

NYT Adds Sick Editors’ Note to Viral Photo of Child Starving in Gaza,” proclaimed The New Republic.

Conservative pundit Glenn Beck threw a furious fit.

AIPAC hilariously accused the notoriously pro-Israel New York Times of being “instinctively against Israel”.

Israel apologists like David Frum, Gad Saad, Brianna Wu, Eyal Yakoby, Eylon Levy, Batya Ungar-Sargon, Eli David, Stephen L Miller, David Collier, Noah Pollak, and John Podhoretz went nuts on Twitter.

They quietly added an editor’s note, but the lie already went global,” tweeted the Israel Foreign Ministry account.

Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman said that Israel should sue The New York Times and other outlets for libel.

CNN’s Scott Jennings tweeted that the photo was evidence that a “propaganda mission” had been fulfilled.

And it was all complete bull. All of it.

Any expert in the field will tell you that the first people likely to die in any famine will be young children, the elderly, and people with chronic health problems. Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq is two of the three. Israel apologists are citing obvious evidence that Gaza is being starved and claiming it’s evidence that Gaza is not being starved, and bizarrely acting as though sick children being starved to death makes Israel look better instead of worse.

An independent fact-checking platform called Misbar reports the following:

Misbar interviewed Hedaya al-Mutawaq, the mother of 19-month-old Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, and found Israeli claims about her son’s condition to be misleading.

“‘My son Mohammed was born in December 2023, during the war, without any chronic illnesses,’ Hedaya told Misbar. ‘Doctors diagnosed him with macrocephaly, which they said was caused by nutritional deficiencies during pregnancy due to the Israeli war.’

She emphasized that Mohammed was healthy and of normal weight at birth. ‘Over the past four months of displacement, his condition worsened due to the severe shortage of food. That is when he developed acute malnutrition.’

Misbar included a photo of Mohammed which his mother provided, showing a healthy-looking infant prior to Israel’s increased starvation campaign.

So Israel is killing disabled kids using siege warfare to deprive them of food and medical care, and its defenders are claiming this makes Israel look like the heroes in this story rather than the villains. It takes a special kind of psychopathy to think this is a winning argument.

This isn’t even the only time they’ve done this.

The other day Israel’s official Twitter account tried to claim that a photo of a dead skeletal man proves people are sharing disinformation about Israel, because it turns out the man had untreated diabetes. Back in December 2023, Human Rights Watch published an article titled “Gaza Blockade Puts People with Diabetes at Risk.”

Israel’s COGAT account tweeted that “Hamas is using photos of sick children to push the ‘starvation’ narrative and blame Israel” by pointing out that a starving 14 year-old child in a photograph actually has “a genetic disease.”

They’re actually trying to argue that people with chronic illness suffering under a siege more than healthy people is evidence of their innocence, rather than the normal thing you’d expect to be seeing at this point if Israel was intentionally starving a civilian population.

This is a new level of disgusting, in two years of record-shattering levels of disgusting.

Don’t expect that some of us will ever let Israel’s supporters live this one down, and this should include you.

FALSE CLAIMS WERE PEDDLED BY RUSSIAGATE’S ARCHITECTS TO SUPPRESS DOUBTS ABOUT ITS CLAIMS

According To Newly Declassified Documents, American Intelligence Leaders Concealed High-Level Doubts About One Of Russiagate’s Foundational Allegations.

The claim was that Russia stole and leaked Democratic Party material to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton.

Although Robert Mueller failed to find an election conspiracy between Donald Trump and Moscow, the former Special Counsel threw a lifeline to the Russiagate narrative by alleging that the Kremlin had engaged in a “sweeping and systematic” effort to get Trump elected and “sow discord” among Americans.

Six years later, that questionable but enduring claim continues to unravel.

According to newly declassified documents, American intelligence leaders concealed high-level doubts about one of Russiagate’s foundational allegations: that Russia stole and leaked Democratic Party material to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. In a September 2016 report that was never made public until now, the NSA and the FBI broke with their intelligence counterparts and expressed “low confidence” in the attribution to Russia.

The previously undisclosed dissent about Russia’s alleged hacking activities in the 2016 election is among several revelations released last week by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence. According to Gabbard, President Obama and senior members of his cabinet “manufactured and politicized intelligence” in its waning months to wage “a years-long coup against President Trump.”

Gabbard’s material adds to a body of evidence previously reported by RealClearInvestigations that challenges the widely parroted claim about the quality of evidence and the extent of Russian “interference operations” in the 2016 election. These conclusions – based on questionable assertions presented as hard facts – have been falsely portrayed as an intelligence consensus. When Trump, the nation’s commander-in-chief, cast doubt on the Russian interference allegations in a July 2018 news conference, former CIA chief John Brennan denounced him as “nothing short of treasonous.”

It turns out that Trump was not out of sync with the American intelligence community he was accused of betraying.

LOW CONFIDENCE” IN CORE ALLEGATION

Until now, the purported American intelligence consensus on Russian meddling has been conveyed to the public in three seminal reports.

The first was a January 2017 intelligence community assessment (ICA) released in the final days of the Obama administration under the direction of Brennan and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. The ICA accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of ordering an “influence campaign” to “denigrate” Democratic candidate Clinton and “help” Trump win the 2016 election. Some of this effort involved propaganda on Russian media outlets and messaging on social media.

The larger component hinged on the allegation that the GRU, Russia’s main intelligence agency, stole emails and documents from the Democratic Party and released that material principally via two online entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, as well as the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has long denied that Russia or any other state actor was his source. Nevertheless, the January 2017 ICA stated that American intelligence had “high confidence” that Russia engineered the hack.

The Mueller report, issued more than two years later, advanced the ICA’s claims with even more confidence and specificity. A bipartisan Senate intelligence review, released in August 2020, endorsed the ICA and Mueller reports and was widely treated as a vindication of the conduct of the intelligence officials behind them.

The documents newly declassified by Gabbard show that the ICA, Mueller, and Senate reports all excluded the intelligence community’s own secretly identified doubts and evidentiary gaps on the core allegation of Russian meddling.

In a previously unpublished Intelligence Community Assessment circulated within the government on Sept. 12th, 2016 (hereafter “September ICA”), the FBI and NSA expressed “low confidence” that Russia was behind the hack and release of Democratic Party emails. American intelligence agencies, the report explained, “lack sufficient technical details” to link the stolen Democratic Party material released by WikiLeaks and other sources “to Russian state-sponsored actors.”

The joint FBI-NSA dissent was especially significant given their central role in investigating Russia’s alleged cyber meddling. With its sweeping foreign surveillance capability, the NSA is the agency best positioned to assess the source of the alleged hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). Meanwhile, the FBI had taken the lead in probing the cyber-theft and release of stolen material from the Democratic Party networks. The private acknowledgment that these two agencies did not have the “technical” data to link the hacking to Russia bolsters longstanding criticism, overlooked by legacy media, that the “Russian interference” allegations lacked supporting evidence.

Contrary to subsequent assertions, the September ICA shows that the American intelligence community had no hard evidence that Putin ordered the theft of Democratic Party material as part of an influence campaign to help Trump.

If the disclosures of the DNC and DCCC documents were indeed orchestrated by the Russian intelligence services,” the report stated, “those services would very likely have sought Putin’s approval for the operation.” This passage indicates that American intelligence had declined to endorse assertions promoted by Brennan and leaked to the media during Trump’s first term, that a highly placed Kremlin mole had captured Putin’s orders to meddle in the 2016 election in support of Trump. The alleged mole was later identified as a mid-level Kremlin official named Oleg Smolenkov, who left Russia to live in the Virginia suburbs under his own name.

ISRAEL’S GAZA WAR IS ‘DESTRUCTION OF A CIVILIZATION’ SAYS NORWEGIAN AID CHIEF

Israel’s Military Operation In Gaza Is No Longer A War Against Militants But Has Become A “Destruction Of A Civilization,” A Top Aid Official Said.

Israel’s military operation in Gaza is no longer a war against militants but has become a “destruction of a civilization,” a top aid official said, warning that time is running out to prevent a “biblical famine” in the besieged enclave.

In an interview on Tuesday, Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, said Israel’s continued bombardment and restrictions on aid access have left Gaza’s civilian population, particularly women and children, to suffer the consequences of a conflict they had no part in.

“What I see is that, as a military conflict, it was all over a long time ago,” Egeland said. “This is not targeted anti-terrorist warfare, it’s the destruction of a civilization now.”

The veteran humanitarian said there are no justifications for the war on Gaza, which has killed more than 60,000 people and pushed the enclave’s population of 2.2 million to the brink of famine.

“Hamas has a million sins on their conscience … but those dying (and) bleeding have nothing to do with Hamas. These are women and children. They had nothing to do with Oct. 7,” he said, calling for an immediate ceasefire and an urgent and large-scale opening of Gaza’s border crossings to allow full access for aid groups.

Egeland’s remarks come amid growing international pressure on Israel to ease restrictions and allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, as malnutrition-related deaths continue to rise. During a Saudi-French conference on Tuesday, UN experts confirmed that large areas of the enclave are now experiencing full-scale famine.

Israel has responded with efforts to increase aid deliveries including a temporary pause in military operations, partial openings of humanitarian corridors, and aid airdrops.

Egeland, however, said such efforts are not enough “to avert a biblical famine on our watch,” criticizing the air drops and temporary corridors for offering little relief to a starving population.

While he welcomed the shifting stances of President Donald Trump, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and other Western leaders who finally recognized the widespread starvation gripping the Palestinian territory, Egeland emphasized that the solution to avert the crisis ultimately rests with them.

“It is Israel and the Western powers that provide the arms to all of this that have to change this. They have the fingerprint all over this catastrophe really. We can change it. It’s still possible.”

Despite the mounting death toll and near-total collapse of humanitarian infrastructure, Egeland said the international community still has a chance to avert the worst — but only if it acts immediately and decisively.

“It has to be a massive ramp up. And time is running out,” he warned.

On Monday, in a meeting with Starmer, Trump acknowledged that there is “real starvation” in Gaza. The British prime minister announced the following day that the UK will recognize a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes significant steps to end the “appalling situation” in Gaza and meets other conditions.

Egeland said Western leaders were finally acknowledging warnings that aid agencies had been raising for months.

“These capitals have known so, because we told them for many months, I’m glad it’s — there is a wakeup call now. It is very late,” he said.

Addressing the humanitarian catastrophe, the NRC chief noted the collapse of the food and health sectors, saying that people were dying from preventable disease and lack of water and sanitation.

He said his NGO has been finding it impossible to provide the basic services of water, sanitation and shelter due to the total depletion of fuel and continued restrictions.

The organization, he noted, is “still denied access for our water and sanitation hygiene items, our food and our tents.”

The aid chief paid tribute to the resilience of his Palestinian colleagues in Gaza, describing them as “real heroes” who have endured repeated displacement, hunger, and profound personal loss while continuing their humanitarian work.

“If there is anyone I would give the Nobel Peace Prize to, I would give it to my colleagues on the ground, Palestinian, in Gaza, the single mothers who are also aid workers.

“But they’re really broken now, after all of these months of starvation, all of these months of having their homes destroyed.”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started