THE STRUGGLE AGAINST THE EMPIRE IS NOT AN EASY FIGHT

Good People Fight Them Because What The Hell Else Are You Going To Do? Even If The Treads Of The Machine Are Going To Roll Over Us All In The End, At Least You’ll Go Down Knowing You Tried To Stop It.

There are no easy fights in the struggle against the empire. Lots of losses and no clean wins.

You spend years protesting the genocide in Gaza, and you get a fake, crappy “ceasefire” deal that’s just designed to shut you up while Israel continues creating hell for the Palestinians and carving off more pieces of their territory.

Humanity manages to avoid nuclear conflict at the most dangerous points of the Ukraine war, but the country continues getting torn apart for years in an idiotic bloodbath that could have been easily avoided with a little diplomacy and common sense.

Assange gets free, but only after he agrees to plead guilty to doing journalism, and only after years of cruel treatment have made an example of him for all the world to see.

Public trust in the mainstream media finally gets obliterated, only for the imperial perception managers to come up with Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation and plutocrat-owned AI chatbots to retain control of the narrative.

The capitalists get everything they want, and succeed in advancing any ecocidal, dystopian agenda of their choosing so long as it generates profits or bolsters the imperial power structure.

Republicans win and they still act like underdog victims. Democrats win and they act like Republicans. Meanwhile any real political opposition which starts getting its legs underneath it gets stomped into the dirt in its infancy.

Your heroes let you down. Your allies die. The geopolitical developments you hope to see never quite pan out. Whenever there’s a moment of relative calm the dissident factions get restless and start cannibalizing themselves with counterproductive infighting and lateral-punching.

And the treads of the imperial juggernaut keep rolling forward.

Some days it makes you feel like a crippled child throwing a rock at a tank.

There are no easy fights. No wins by first-round knockout. At best it’s a grinding slog from bell to bell where you’re spitting out blood between rounds and sucking wind through your gum shield with broken ribs and a busted nose.

But you fight on anyway.

Not because you enjoy it. Not because you’re good at it. Not because you feel like you’re going to win. You keep biting down on your mouthguard and throwing hands for no other reason than because that’s all you can do.

These freaks are killing our planet. They’re committing genocide. They’re waving armageddon weapons around like cocks and playing chicken with the lives of every terrestrial organism. They’re driving us further and further into a tyrannical mind-controlled dystopia while doing everything they can to choke off our artistic brilliance and poison all the best things about our species.

You fight them because what else are you going to do? Even if the treads of the machine are going to roll over us all in the end, at least you’ll go down knowing you left it all in the ring.

So you fight on. You give it everything you’ve got, even when it feels like you’re throwing haymakers at a mountain. You eat some leather, you spit out a tooth, and you return fire.

Because there’s nothing else you can do.

And there’s nothing that matters more.

LEGAL CONCERNS WITH THE DEADLY STRIKES ON DRUG BOATS WERE IGNORED BY TRUMP

The Trump Administration Sidestepped Skeptical Lawyers Across National Security Agencies As It Pursued A Military Campaign Against Alleged Narcotraffickers, Officials Say.

Donald Trump and his top White House aides pushed for lethal strikes on Western Hemisphere drug traffickers almost as soon as they took office in January, and in the past 10 months have repeatedly steamrolled or sidestepped government lawyers who questioned whether the provocative policy was legal, according to multiple current and former officials familiar with the debates.

As Trump weighs what could be imminent military action against Venezuela and its leader, Nicolás Maduro, while striking at alleged drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, new details are emerging about the evolution of a strategy that involves unprecedented American military force against the narcotics trade — and, critics say, outsize legal risk.

But early on, according to two people familiar with the matter, the administration proposed having the CIA use its unique covert authorities to conduct the lethal strikes on drug traffickers that Trump and Stephen Miller, his powerful homeland security adviser, wanted.

The spy agency, under Director John Ratcliffe, was rapidly ramping up its counternarcotics arm, consciously modeling the effort to mirror the post-9/11 American regime’s war against “terrorists.”

White House officials initiated proposals that envisioned the CIA taking the lead, and work began on drafting a presidential authorization for covert action, known as a “finding.”

Lawyers at the spy agency and elsewhere in the government were skeptical. Was killing civilian drug traffickers defensible under domestic law, they asked, if the cartels do not actually seek to attack Americans, even if the product they smuggle might lead to deaths in the United States? Was it legal to kill drug traffickers, many of them apparently low-level, without knowing their identities?

There is no actual threat justifying self defense — there are not organized armed groups seeking to kill Americans,” said one person familiar with the legal debate, who like others interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retribution and because of the matter’s sensitivity.

Though the hand behind covert actions is supposed to be hidden, Miller and his team wanted to publicize any strikes on what Trump has deemed “narcoterrorists,” including through videos of drug labs or boats being blown up, one person familiar with the matter said.

Amid pushback on CIA action from lawyers in the late spring, the administration forged ahead with an alternative plan that was already under discussion: to use the military. And it came up with a legal justification that national security law experts inside and out of government have said does not stand up to facts: that the country was in a “non-international” armed conflict with “designated terrorist organizations.”

This account of the evolution of the Trump administration’s lethal counter-drug strategy is based on interviews with almost 20 current and former officials and other people familiar with aspects of the discussions.

President Trump is prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding in to our country and to bring those responsible to justice,” a senior administration official said in an email in response to questions, noting that operations have been given careful legal scrutiny and were deemed lawful.

By midsummer, the administration was considering boat strikes and a second set of Venezuela-focused options, which included the seizure of oil fields and a “snatch and grab” of Maduro, said one former official.

President Trump has been clear in his message to Maduro: Stop sending drugs and criminals to our country,” said the senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the matter’s sensitivity.

THE AMERICAN REGIME ONLY DE-ESCALATES CONFLICT IN ONE AREA SO THAT IT CAN ESCALATE IN ANOTHER

The Violence Of The Empire Remains Constant. Peace Is Never The Goal. Peace Is Never Pursued For Its Own Sake, Because There’s Nothing In It For The Empire.

Just as things cool down a bit in the middle east, the American regime has relocated the USS Gerald Ford from the Mediterranean Sea to the Caribbean while the Trump administration discusses plans to bomb Venezuela.

The violence of the empire remains constant. Peace is never the goal. You get happy they’re pulling the world’s largest aircraft carrier away from Iran, then it turns out they’re only doing it so they can move it to Venezuela. You get happy they’re pulling out of Afghanistan, then suddenly they’re waging a proxy war in Ukraine.

These days whenever you see the imperial war machinery getting pulled from one area, you know it’s just going to be sent someplace else.

Peace is never pursued for its own sake, because there’s nothing in it for the empire. There’s too much power and money in nonstop warmongering for peace to be allowed to become the norm.

Which is just insane if you think about it. Every normal person wants peace in their own lives. None of us want our time on this planet to be disturbed by violence, chaos and bloodshed.

The western world has created a machine whose behavior goes against every healthy human impulse. The American regime led world order has given birth to an out of control monster with an insatiable appetite for human flesh.

It was reported that in 2024 the Biden administration had intelligence showing that the IDF was using Palestinians as human shields in Gaza. But Biden continued shipping genocide weapons to the Israelis the entire time he was in office.

You’ll still periodically see online liberals trying to shame leftists for not voting for Kamala, but the more information comes out about what the Biden administration was up to during that time the more genocidal they look. Biden-Harris are looking worse with time, not better.

When you see what a large-scale power broker Jeffrey Epstein was for Israeli intelligence, you understand why it’s entirely reasonable to suspect that extensive state resources would be put toward an elaborate plot to murder him in his prison cell and make it look like a suicide.

Vice President JD Vance and Fox News propagandist Sean Hannity spent some time furiously agreeing with each other during a recent interview about how wonderful Elon Musk’s Grok AI is.

I’m a Grok guy. I think it’s the best. It’s also the least woke,” the veep said.

It’s wild how Musk just openly showed the entire world in real time how powerful people can build political biases into AI services for their own benefit. He won’t be the only one doing this. Just as trust in the legacy media collapses, the ruling class has created a replacement to retain control of the narrative.

AI stuff only looks impressive to mediocre people for the same reason a chess novice couldn’t tell you whether they were playing against a Grandmaster or just someone who’s pretty good at chess. We can only appreciate something up to the level of our own adeptness.

To someone who’s not very bright, an AI’s imitation of reasoning looks sharp. Someone with no aptitude for writing or appreciation for great literature will think its prose reads brilliantly. Its poetry looks good to those who don’t understand poetry. Its “art” looks great to those with no artistic sensibility. It’s music sounds awesome to those with no musical depth. Only those who are emotionally stunted and incapable of meaningful human connection will find them to be stimulating conversationalists and companions.

Like so much else capitalism produces, it’s a product that’s designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator. For everyone else it looks vapid and gross, just like daytime talk shows, Hollywood blockbusters, and trashy tabloids always have.

That’s just how it works in a society which only elevates that which can generate profits. The food is designed to induce craving rather than facilitate health. The entertainment is designed to distract and sedate rather than to edify. The social media is designed to be addictive rather than to help people connect with each other. It’s all geared to appeal to our baser instincts rather than to improve and inform us.

Anyone who is interested in actually growing as a person will have less and less use for anything AI has to offer. Past a certain point of personal development, it simply cannot satisfy.

ABDUCTIONS DURING ISRAELI INCURSIONS STOKE FEAR IN SYRIA’S OCCUPIED GOLAN HEIGHTS

When Syrians Gather To Record Israeli Incursions, Soldiers Point Their Guns At Them. Israeli Military Incursions Have Become More Brazen, More Frequent And More Violent.

This has happened since Israel expanded its occupation of southern Syria following the ousting of President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024.

Across Quneitra province, the Israeli military’s tanks have established checkpoints and patrols, even setting up gates. They stop and search civilians, and some are abducted.

Khadija Arnous’s husband and brother-in-law are among those taken from their home in July. Her brother-in-law was released from Sednaya prison, and now he is in Israeli custody.

At 3 am one day, Israeli soldiers ordered both men to leave the house and blindfolded them.

We’ve had no news about them since,” Arnous said, covering her face for fear of reprisal. “We contacted the Red Cross, but to no avail.”

I have four children – my husband was the sole provider. I urge the government to find a solution for us. Why are the Israelis coming and taking whoever they want?”

SYRIA’S OCCUPIED GOLAN HEIGHTS

Described by Israel as security operations, Syrian authorities and human rights groups refer to such incidents as abductions or unlawful arrests. As many as 40 people have reportedly been detained in recent weeks.

Israel first seized territory in the Golan Heights following the 1967 war. But after the fall of al-Assad, it claimed its 1974 disengagement agreement with Syria was void and has widened its occupation in Syria by some 400sq km (155sq miles).

Mohammad Mazen Mriwed, an elder from Jubata al-Khashab village, said that people are living in fear of Israeli incursions and can no longer work their land.

Since the fall of the regime, many are no longer building or cultivating,” he said. “We don’t know how the government will respond, but true relief will come only when the occupation ends.”

In addition to taking Syrians, Israeli forces are also fortifying their positions with large berms and watchtowers. It has verified that Israel has established nine new Israeli military camps in Syria since December 2024.

SYRIA’S OCCUPIED GOLAN HEIGHTS

Local elders estimate 1,700 acres (688 hectares) of land seized by Israeli forces includes orchards, fields and grazing lands.

Israeli forces have flattened entire areas, uprooting trees believed to be hundreds of years old, to build more military presence on Syrian soil, villagers and shepherds say.

Mohammad Makkiyah went too close to a watchtower and was shot by an Israeli sniper. He says the first shot missed his head, but as he ran from a volley of fire, a bullet hit his leg.

In a nearby house, Hussain Bakr’s son and brother were taken five months ago.

We complained to the UN and the Red Cross, who told us that they will ask the Israelis, but there is no response,” Bakr told Al Jazeera. “They are innocent, taken for no reason.”

Residents say interim Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa should remember his own family’s displacement when Israel occupied the Golan Heights. The president has previously said his grandfather was forced to flee the area in 1967.

Government representatives say they are trying for solutions through diplomacy.

But until the missing come home, words offer little solace.

The situation is painful for the families and for us as a government,” Jamal Numairi said. “To the families, I say: the government will spare no effort to resolve the issue. I consider them kidnapped, not as prisoners.”

THE TRUMP REGIME MULLS A “TERRORIST” LABEL FOR VENEZUELA’S CARTEL DE LOS SOLES, BUT IT DOESN’T EXIST

That Refers To Alleged Corruption Within The Venezuelan Military. Experts Say A “non-thing” Is Being Designated By Trump To Justify Attacking Venezuela.

Semantics are key in the times of war, or when planning one.

So when the American regime announced plans to designate Cartel de los Soles as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO), reiterating claims that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro heads the “drug gang” amid a significant American military build-up near Venezuela, it vexed some experts.

They see the phrase — coined in 1990 by some local Venezuelan journalists to describe some “corrupt” military officials — being employed by the American regime to target what they argue is a non-existent drug cartel.

“The Trump administration’s decision to label the so-called ‘Cartel de los Soles’ as a terrorist organisation is deeply problematic,” Jenaro Abraham, a political scientist and professor of Latin American politics at Gonzaga University, said.

“To begin with, the Cartel de los Soles doesn’t actually function as a cartel in any meaningful analytical sense.”

The term “Cartel de los Soles” — Spanish for “Cartel of the Suns” — vaguely refers to the alleged corruption within the Venezuelan military and the name alludes to the sun insignia on high-ranking officials’ uniforms.

Abraham, who focuses on the American regime’s foreign policy towards Latin America, argues that the phrase refers loosely to corruption patterns within certain sectors of the Venezuelan military — mostly along the Colombian border — “but there’s no hierarchical structure, no centralised leadership, and no price-setting mechanisms like you’d expect from a real cartel.”

“It’s an invented label that collapses a variety of local dynamics into a single, scary-sounding enemy.”

Venezuela’s President Maduro denies the American regime’s claims about the Cartel de los Soles, calling it a fabrication used for manipulation. But his critics argue against downplaying it.

Venezuelan opposition figures Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia and Maria Corina Machado have been seeking the American regime’s classification of Cartel de los Soles as a terror group.

AMERICA’S MILITARY BUILD-UP NEAR VENEZUELA

Tensions between the American regime and Venezuela have been on the rise since President Donald Trump this August ordered a military deployment in the Caribbean with the aim of attacking what he claims are drug cartels linked to Maduro.

Caracas and several Latin America experts argue that what the Trump is actually seeking to do is topple the Maduro’s government.

Since August, the American military has carried out a total of 21 strikes on vessels it claimed were loaded with drugs, and killed 83 people, and Trump has signalled he could attack alleged drug trafficking targets on the ground in Venezuela.

The American regime has deployed the world’s largest aircraft carrier to the Caribbean near Venezuela. The deployment of the massive warship, USS Gerald R. Ford, experts say, aims to do one of several things: either intimidate Maduro into fleeing, lay the groundwork for a military coup, or, in the worst-case scenario, trigger an American military intervention.

New reports suggest Trump has authorised the CIA to prepare covert operations inside Venezuela as part of a broader pressure campaign against President Maduro’s government.

In a televised address on Monday, Maduro warned that any American military invasion would mark the “political end” of Trump’s leadership, accusing figures around the American president of “provoking” an armed conflict to damage him politically.

Maduro alluded to senior American officials, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who recently declared impending American sanctions and designation for Cartel de los Soles.

“Based in Venezuela, the Cartel de los Soles is headed by Nicolas Maduro and other high-ranking individuals of the illegitimate Maduro regime who have corrupted Venezuela’s military, intelligence, legislature, and judiciary,” Rubio said in a statement.

“Cartel de los Soles, by and with other designated FTOs, including Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel, are responsible for terrorist violence throughout our hemisphere as well as for trafficking drugs into the United States and Europe.”

Rubio added that Washington will continue to protect its interests and deny funding and resources to “narco-terrorists.”

It was in 2020 when the Trump administration accused Maduro and Venezuelan officials of “narco-terrorism, corruption and drug trafficking”. At the time the American Department of Justice claimed that Cartel de los Soles had existed since at least 1999.

INTELLECTUALLY SLOPPY”

Experts suggest that Cartel de los Soles may not exist or even function as a cohesive entity.

“The idea that the Cartel de los Soles is a unified terrorist organisation is largely a Western construction. It’s been circulated not because it reflects empirical reality, but because it provides geopolitical utility — it creates a ready-made justification for intervention,” Abraham notes.

“We’ve seen this strategy before: invent or exaggerate an external threat, and leverage that fear to authorise military action.”

Abraham of Gonzaga University says that calling Cartel de los Soles a “cartel” is “intellectually sloppy.”

“Cartels, by definition, control prices and regulate trade. No one in Venezuela — certainly not an imaginary command structure — is setting global cocaine prices or dictating the terms of the regional market,” Abraham explains.

“Those prices are governed by logistical routes, laundering networks, and demand conditions — many of which are anchored in the United States and Europe.”

Phil Gunson, a senior analyst for the International Crisis Group who lives in Caracas told New York Times that Cartel de los Soles is a label that was invented by Venezuelan journalists and does not exist as such.

“There is no such thing as a board meeting of the ‘Cartel de los Soles.’ There is no such animal. The organization doesn’t exist as such.”

Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer who specialises in war powers issues said that the Trump administration is “designating a non-thing that is not a terror organisation as a terrorist organization”.

OLD IMPERIAL PLAYBOOK”

The FTO designation for Cartel de los Soles is a significant counterterrorism measure. It could allow the US military to target Maduro’s assets inside Venezuela.

Abraham accuses the major American media outlets of uncritically amplifying the government narrative that he says “mirrors an old imperial playbook.”

“Americans were told the Spanish were a threat to national security before the Spanish-American War; Panamanian sovereignty was delegitimised to build the canal; Iraq supposedly had weapons of mass destruction,” he argues.

“Each time, the story wasn’t just wrong — it was politically useful. The “Cartel de los Soles” narrative fits that pattern. It manufactures consent for intervention while obscuring the deeper geopolitical and economic motivations at play.”

LIFE HAS BEEN RESHAPED IN CUBA BY AMERICAN SANCTIONS – THEY MUST BE STOPPED!

The Ongoing American Actions Are ‘suffocating The Social Fabric Of Cuban Society’, According To An Expert.

The American regime must lift unilateral sanctions imposed on Cuba as they are “causing significant effects across all aspects of life” more than six decades after they were imposed during the early part of Fidel Castro’s leadership, according to a senior United Nations expert.

The “extensive regime of economic, trade and financial restrictions” against the island nation marks the longest-running unilateral sanctions policy in US history, said Alena Douhan, special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on human rights.

Only the Congress can lift the Cold War-era embargo on communist-run Cuba, whose government has maintained that the country “will not surrender” to Washington’s “policy of collective punishment”.

As a result, generations of Cubans have lived under unilateral coercive measures, which has shaped the country’s economic and social landscape,” Douhan said in a statement released on Friday.

The UN official cited reports that Washington’s imposed measures have progressively tightened since 2018, with further sanctions imposed on the already existing ones and a significant intensification in 2021 following Cuba’s re-designation as a so-called “state sponsor of terrorism”.

Other countries and international companies also over-comply with the embargoes in an effort to steer clear of being targeted with secondary sanctions, which Douhan said affects the government and the people’s ability for long-term planning, “suffocating the social fabric of Cuban society”.

America’s regimes have for decades ignored international calls to remove the sanctions on Cuba, including the overwhelming UN General Assembly vote at the end of October that showed global support for an end to the embargo for a 33rd year.

According to the UN rapporteur, there are shortages of food, medicine, electricity, water, essential machinery and spare parts in Cuba, while a growing emigration of skilled workers, including medical staff, engineers and teachers, is further straining the country.

The accumulative effect has “severe consequences for the enjoyment of human rights, including the rights to life, food, health and development”, Douhan said.

Cuba has suffered a series of electricity blackouts, grid collapses that have rocked the island of 10 million over the past year.

Even when the American regime issues very limited licences and exemptions, the UN expert said investors remain wary of committing to long-term projects since there could be a policy shift in Washington.

I urge all states to adhere to international law principles and norms and ensure that humanitarian concerns are fully respected, grounded in principles of mutual respect, solidarity, cooperation and multilateralism,” she said.

Douhan will present a thorough report to the UN Human Rights Council on the effect of the American regime’s sanctions in September 2026, following meetings with government officials, international agencies, church representatives, members of academia, medical personnel and the private sector.

MEDDLING IN ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS WAS CLAIMED BY JEFFERY EPSTEIN

Files Show Jeffrey Epstein Claiming To Have Been Involved In Barak’s 2019 Election Challenge To Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s Time To Ask More About The Billionaire Pedophile’s Links To Israel.

Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends.”

That’s one of the sensational, damning Jeffrey Epstein messages that has been roundly quoted since being extracted from the more than 20,000 documents released by the House Oversight Committee last week, a seeming reference to the power Epstein held via the damaging information he had amassed on the rich and influential, the now-president included.

Yet oddly, what has been universally left out of media coverage of that quote is what it was in reference to: Epstein appeared to be taking credit for former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak’s reentry into Israeli politics in 2019, which aimed to topple current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the second of what would be three Israeli elections in a year.

The quote’s missing context fits squarely with the unofficial deception in the mainstream press on discussing Epstein’s relationship to Israel — namely, the long-standing claims and rumors that the billionaire pedophile had been an asset or otherwise worked for Israeli intelligence.

That code of silence has been on the verge of breaking down over the past month, after a series of stories was published based on Barak’s hacked emails showing Epstein quietly carrying out work on behalf of the Israeli government. On Sunday, former Donald Trump ally Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene pointed to the reporting while on CNN to charge that “the right question to ask is, ‘Was Jeffrey Epstein working for Israel?’” — a charge met with pushback on the network.

The Oversight Committee’s release sheds further light on Epstein’s entanglement with Israel, primarily through the figure of Barak, long a known associate of Epstein’s who has insisted that he only saw the convicted pedophile “on occasion” and never in the presence of women or girls. The recently released tranche of emails adds to a raft of disclosures in recent years that shows the two men were far closer than Barak publicly let on.

Ironically, many of those disclosures came in the wake of Barak’s apparently Epstein-backed attempt to reignite his political career.

In June 2019, after spending years attacking Netanyahu’s increasingly extreme and corruption-embroiled rule, Barak, a former defense minister and military chief of staff, officially came out of retirement and formed a new party to challenge him. In a chat with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon that month, Epstein implied the move was his doing, as he shared a report from an Israeli outlet about Barak’s announcement.

I’ve been busy,” Epstein wrote in a follow-up message. “Wow!!!” Bannon replied.

I’m dealing with Ehud in Israel. Making me crazy,” Epstein elaborated twelve minutes later.

Ehud massive– can we announce I’m his strategic advisor?” Bannon asked.

This will be a long campaign. Elections in sept (17). Lots to talk about,” Epstein wrote back.

This is brilliant move,” wrote Bannon.

Thx. Only the first step,” Epstein replied, before writing the quote that has been so widely spread in the past week free of its context. “Now you can understand why Trump wakes up in the middle of the night sweating when he hears you and I are friends.”

Dangerous,” replied Bannon.

There are no other details in Epstein’s emails about his claimed involvement in Barak’s campaign, though he may have been hinting to Bannon that something like it was in the works. A month earlier, Epstein had sent Bannon a BBC report on Netanyahu’s failure to form a coalition government in the wake of Israel’s April 2019 election, which had triggered another round of elections to be held that September.

Will Ehud Be PM,” Bannon asked him at the end of June. “Doubtful,” replied Epstein. “But 1. He is not to be underestimated. 2. Unlikely top job. But depends on coalition. 3. Driving me crazy.”

What helped sink Epstein’s “dangerous” plan to reshape the Israeli political landscape was, fittingly, Epstein himself. Not long after these messages, the billionaire was arrested and charged with sex trafficking minors, and a series of scandalous new revelations about Barak’s ties to Epstein soon followed. Netanyahu made them the centerpiece of his political offensive against Barak, going so far as to officially request an investigation of him from the attorney general, putting the challenger on the defensive and taking the wind out of the sails of Barak’s attacks on Netanyahu’s own criminal scandals.

Severely damaged by the revelations, Barak’s poorly polling party was forced to form an alliance with several other left-leaning parties to have any hope of winning seats in the Knesset, and he had to essentially take himself out of the running for a cabinet spot to get them over the line. One can only imagine how Epstein’s claimed involvement in that very political project would have further dented its standing, if Netanyahu had been able to use it.

Bannon’s claim to being Barak’s “strategic advisor” was likely a joke, but the two had met at least once before via their mutual connection with Epstein. In a February 2018 email, Epstein asked Kathryn Ruemmler — former White House counsel to Barack Obama who had a mysteriously close relationship with the billionaire sex trafficker — whether Bill Clinton “would like to join you me ehud and steve” in a meeting they had apparently already arranged. (Despite this email already being reported on by outlets like CNBC and the New York Post, each wrongly published the reference to Barak’s first name as “chud,” thereby obscuring his identity).

Upon learning that Epstein had had a hand in Barak’s sudden return to politics a year later, Bannon immediately tried to make himself useful to the former prime minister.

My guy is in Israel– can we connect him to erhud [sic] ???” Bannon asked Epstein. “On it,” Epstein wrote back.

Even with the wealth of material that’s been released, Epstein’s exact relationship to Israel remains unclear, not to mention an answer to the specific question of whether or not he belonged to Israeli intelligence. While the latest disclosures show Epstein had a keen interest in Israel and its politics, they also show he held a similar interest in many countries and regions and had relationships with a variety of power players across the Middle East and around the world.

But what they should mean, at minimum, is an end to the widespread taboo of even asking questions about billionaire sex offender’s links to the Israeli state. Epstein brokered security deals for Israel, had a close friendship with one of its former prime ministers and military officials, and, apparently, even secretly involved himself in the country’s elections. If it were any other country, it would not be remotely scandalous to wonder out loud what it could all mean.

ISRAEL SHELLED PALESTINIANS FOR BEING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE YELLOW LINE AFTER MOVING IT

They Just Keep Finding New Ways To Carve Off More Pieces Of Gaza And Murder More Palestinians. That Should Tell A Lot About The Nature Of The Israeli Regime.

It was reported that the IDF quietly moved part of the “yellow line” which divides Gaza 300 meters forward, and then started shelling Palestinians for being on the “wrong side” of the line.

They just keep finding new ways to carve off more pieces of Gaza and murder more Palestinians.

Haaretz has a disturbing story out about a 14 year-old Palestinian boy who was waiting for his school bus in the West Bank on a quiet street eating a cookie, when suddenly a bunch of IDF vehicles pulled up and a soldier shot him directly in the face with a teargas canister. Then they sped off.

The boy lost his right eye in the attack.

Israelis will just casually shoot a Palestinian kid in the face for no reason, and then go online and call you hateful for opposing them.

Leftists are going to hate Israel for leftist reasons and rightists are going to hate Israel for rightist reasons. This is not a difference that needs to be reconciled or a problem that needs to be solved.

You’ll see Israel supporters point to the rising number of rightists who oppose Israel and trying to marry it to pro-Palestine leftists in some way. Former Israeli spokesman Eylon Levy claimed that antizionism “builds coalitions on both extremes — and increasingly between them — by mobilizing politics against Jews.” But that’s just some nonsense they’re making up in order to justify their genocidal atrocities. Leftist opposition to Israel is about justice, equality, anticolonialism, antiracism, anti-imperialism, antiwar and anti-apartheid activism, and has nothing whatsoever to do with hating Jews. Rightist opposition to Israel is more about nationalism, anti-interventionism, America First ideology, and yes, in many cases a hatred of Jews. These are two completely different things.

You never saw Zionists bitching about the far right until they started pivoting against Israel; until then they were happy to make alliances with them, and still are as long as they remain supportive of Israel. And half the time you see them citing anti-Israel sentiments on the right it’s only to play guilt-by-association by framing them as the same as the pro-Palestine left.

It’s just more empty narrative-diddling from Israel apologists. It’s not a real argument, and doesn’t require a counter-argument. It’s just them flailing around trying anything they can to stop the entire western political spectrum from flushing Israel down the toilet.

War propagandist Bret Stephens has a new article out titled “The Case for Overthrowing Maduro” in which he argues for American regime change interventionism in Venezuela on the basis that “the regime’s close economic and strategic ties to China, Russia and Iran give America’s enemies a significant foothold in the Americas.”

This would be the same Bret Stephens who in 2023 wrote an article in the New York Times titled “20 Years On, I Don’t Regret Supporting the Iraq War,” by the way.

Right wingers think a mother should be at home raising her children, an arrangement that many mothers would be on board with, but if you say this requires either state support or for employers to be forced to increase pay so that single-income families can exist they say “No that’s socialism!”

They want the mothers to stay at home while the fathers work 80-hour work weeks for ten bucks an hour so that billionaires can become trillionaires.

Elon Musk says that in 10 to 20 years work will be optional and money will be meaningless because AI and automation will eliminate the need for labor and make everything wonderful. Something tells me the guy who just took a trillion-dollar pay package from Tesla doesn’t really believe money is going to be meaningless anytime soon.

This soon-to-be-trillionaire whose ego is so fragile and infantile that his AI chatbot tells people he’s smarter than da Vinci and more athletic than LeBron James is asking us to believe that revolutionary change isn’t necessary because capitalists like himself are going to fix it so that everyone lives in luxury.

LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE AMERICAN EMPIRE

The Difference Between People Who Supported The British Empire And Who Support The American Empire Is That Those Who Supported The British Empire Knew They Were Supporting An Empire.

Someone who supported the British Empire’s acts of mass military slaughter around the world did so because they supported the Crown and wanted His Majesty to civilize the godless savages and turn the whole world into his royal subjects. Someone who supports the American empire’s warmongering thinks they are doing so because Saddam is an evil dictator, because Gaddafi is an evil dictator, because Maduro is an evil dictator, because Hamas and Hezbollah and the Houthis are terrorists, etc.

Supporters of the British Empire understood that the enemies of the Empire were being killed because they refused to adequately subject themselves to the King and his demands. Supporters of the American empire think the American regime and its allies are always attacking Evil Bad Guys in the name of spreading Freedom and Democracy, and if this happens to advance pre-existing geostrategic agendas and/or resource interests then it is purely by coincidence.

Supporters of the British Empire understood that they were living under an actual empire: a power umbrella comprised of colonies, protectorates, dominions, mandates and territories which spanned the globe. Supporters of the American empire think it is entirely by coincidence that there is a giant cluster of nations which happens to move in near-perfect unison on all foreign policy agendas and continually wages war upon nations which are not part of that cluster.

The British Empire was entirely open about what it was. It would conquer a place, tell its inhabitants that they are now British subjects, and make them raise the Union Jack on their flag pole. The western empire which is loosely structured around Washington lets its member states keep their own flag and pretend they’re sovereign nations, while behaving in ways that are not significantly different from the subjects of the British Empire.

The British Empire was open and unapologetic about pilfering resources from the darker-skinned populations it had conquered and using them to improve the lives of people in the imperial core. In the American empire those resources are extracted in the same way, but under cover of slogans like “opening up markets” and “free trade” and “globalization”.

The British Empire was held in place by brute force and overt indoctrination. People were forcibly subjugated and then over the years educated to believe it served their interests to live under the Royal Crown, and if they tried to become independent, the redcoats would be sent in to remind them of His Majesty’s beneficence.

The American regime’s empire is held in place by plenty of brute force as well, but its primary weapon is psychological manipulation. It has the most sophisticated propaganda machine that has ever existed, which trains the minds of its subjects to support all its various agendas of capitalism, militarism, imperialism and global domination under the guise of news media, Hollywood productions, and Silicon Valley tech services. Disobedient nations find their information ecosystems awash with National Endowment for Democracy reeducation media informing them why their current government doesn’t serve their interests, and if that doesn’t work there will be a “revolution” which decades later the CIA will admit to having fomented and armed.

The American empire is a larger, stronger, sneakier, bitchier, less honest, more manipulative version of what the British Empire was. The British Empire told its subjects that they were the property of the King and must do as His Majesty commands. The American regime’s empire subjugates people by tricking them into thinking they are free.

DOCTORS FROM GAZA ARE STILL BEING HELD IN ISRAELI PRISONS

While Some Were Released In The Ceasefire, Israel Still Holds 80 Palestinian Medical Workers Without Charge. Their Families Are Demanding Their Freedom.

When Dr. Ahmad Al-Farra turned his phone camera around in his office at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza, placards reading “Freedom to Dr. Abu Teima” and “We will not leave you” appeared. They were held by Nahed Abu Teima’s wife and children, who have not spoken to him in nearly two years.

Abu Teima was the director of the surgical ward at Nasser Hospital until Israeli forces detained him during a February 2024 raid on the medical complex. His family was addressed after asking Al-Farra, the head of the hospital’s pediatric and maternity ward, what he knew about the seven colleagues taken in that same raid.

Their names appear on a list published by Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI), identifying 17 Gazan doctors — and 80 medical workers overall — who remain in Israeli custody even after Israel’s release of nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees at the start of the ceasefire.

Held without charge or trial in dire conditions, these doctors are denied contact with the outside world, save for infrequent lawyer visits. They face physical violence, medical neglect, and starvation, as a result of which dozens of detainees have died. Yet even when their cases draw significant public attention — like that of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, director of Kamal Adwan Hospital, detained since December 2024 — it has done little to bring about their release.

A few months ago, there was a social media campaign in which Israeli doctors read the testimonies of detained Gazan physicians. They read out the following words: “We need antibiotics and medicines for infections … Sometimes I perform surgeries on prisoners, clean the abscess, open it with a piece of plastic, and disinfect with some chlorine.” It was only after speaking with Abu Teima’s family that it was learned the testimony was his.

Since his detention, Abu Teima has been permitted to see his lawyer only once every six months. After their most recent meeting in early October, the lawyer informed the family that he has lost 25 kilograms, is beaten daily, is told he will never be released, and is being denied his regular blood pressure medication.

At the time of his arrest, Abu Teima had been living with his wife, Arwa, and their nine children inside Nasser Hospital, alongside many other families of medical staff. Israel had destroyed their home in Khan Younis early in the war, and they believed the hospital would offer some protection from the airstrikes.

When the Israeli army raided the medical complex, Abu Teima’s family evacuated but he insisted on staying behind to care for the patients who remained. It was the last time his family saw or spoke to him.

Only in August 2024, with the help of PHRI, did they receive confirmation that he was being held at Ketziot Prison in southern Israel. Their first indirect contact, through a lawyer, came three months later — nearly nine months after his arrest.

Since then, Arwa and the children have been living in a tent in Khan Younis. A practicing gynecologist, she has managed to support the family alone, but it has not been easy: Doctors in Gaza have received no steady salaries since the start of the war, only sporadic lump-sum payments every two to three months

One of her younger sons, Yousef, smiled brightly throughout the conversation despite suffering from heat stroke and an infectious abscess in his leg. When the family came to the hospital to protest for Abu Teima’s release, Al-Farra administered IV fluids and antibiotics; without their connection to the hospital, Yousef’s treatment would have been far harder to secure.

We lose one child in the hospital every day because of a lack of equipment,” Al-Farra told +972. Medications for diabetes, hypertension, and hypothyroidism are scarce. The hospital has run out of test tubes for blood work, and its intensive care units operate without essential infusion equipment.

Although more food has entered Gaza since the ceasefire, Al-Farra explained, staples like meat, milk, eggs, and fresh produce remain largely unavailable. And despite a surge in patients arriving from shuttered hospitals in the north, Nasser has received no additional medical supplies.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started